Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Ulf Nilsson

Ulf Nilsson
Ulf Nilsson
  • 123
    Following
  • 82
    Followers
  • 85
    Posts
  • 24
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
June 23, 2010
Last Seen
15 minutes ago
Member Type
Bridge Pro
about me

Ulf Nilsson

Bridge Information

BBO Username
ulven
ACBL Ranking
None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Rohit Gupta's bidding problem: JT75 --- AKQJ5 AKJ5
I would have bid 3 previous round.
Sarik Goyal's bidding problem: AQ642 --- AJ75 AKQ9
I'd rather give up the game than pass here...
Nikolas Bausback's bidding problem: KJT Q853 AQ4 AQ9
The argument for doubling isn't that I want to defend 1NT and hope to beat it a bunch. It's that we hope partner has some shape (5+ suit) and bids at the 2-level. I'm willing to bet that someone bids (in imps).
Russell Samuel's bidding problem: AKx AJ8xxx QT xx
I think it's best to play 3 as nonforcing, we must be able to get our suits in there when everybody is bidding.
Ulf Nilsson's bidding problem: Q2 87 KQJ7 AQJ42
This is from Wuhan, partner with KJ8764/AK5/A82/9 had a problem over 3 and some missed 6. 10 Tables in 6, 5 in 3NT, 9 in 4, 1 accident 7 X-1.
Ulf Nilsson's bidding problem: Q2 87 KQJ7 AQJ42
I think 2 should show 6 over 2 but that looks like a minority view.
Simon Weinberger's bidding problem: Q8 752 KT654 965
2 for the lead?
Any books on Moscito?
Nigel Dutton published a book around 2000. Don't know if still available somewhere.
Ulf Nilsson's bidding problem: 8 A75 AKQ86 JT43
Eric, I don't understand your reference to "diplomatic immunity". I don't need to make any arguments because this isn't a debate and I don't care. You can have the "win" :-)
Ulf Nilsson's bidding problem: 8 A75 AKQ86 JT43
I am curious why everyone (ok, might be an exaggeration) attribute so much value to passed/unpassed status. It's true that certain shapely hands are no longer possible when partner didn't open a weak 2 or a preemptive 3 (etc) here but when it comes to ...
.

Bottom Home Top