Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Steve Myerson

Steve Myerson
Steve Myerson
  • 0
    Following
  • 3
    Followers
  • 53
    Posts
  • 0
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
April 13, 2013
Last Seen
5 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
Country
United States of America

Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
Bronze Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Common game 9 October afternoon board 23
On the third round of hearts, south discards the king of clubs.
Robin Barker's bidding problem: AT9 --- QJT632 AQJ6
Describing it as [i]artificial[/i] is not sufficient. The explanation should include what it does show.
Gabriel Carrasco's bidding problem: AQJ4 AQ95 3 AT75
Is 2 forcing?
Gabriel Carrasco's bidding problem: AQJ4 AQ95 3 AT75
Wouldn't South have bid 1 instead of 2 if holding 4 spades?
Benoit Lessard's bidding problem: Q98 AJxx AJxx xx
2 was not forcing. 2N also not forcing. And now we're in a forcing auction?
Opening 10 HCP 6m331 hands playing Matchpoints
Thank you, but the answers still aren't all inclusive. You need "Neither and will pass hand 1 and open hand 2 3". That's not my choice, but the answers should cover all possibilities.
Drew Casen's bidding problem: QJ9 Axx Txx Q9xx
My definition of unbalanced, and I'm probably in the minority here, is a hand which contains a singleton or void.
Opening 10 HCP 6m331 hands playing Matchpoints
Where is the option for neither?
Drew Casen's bidding problem: QJ9 Axx Txx Q9xx
3. If partner doesn't take that to be a cue in support of clubs, partner is 100% unbalanced.
Benoit Lessard's bidding problem: Q98 AJxx AJxx xx
I agree with David. At IMPS, making 5 instead of 3N isn't a disaster. Unless I knew 100% that partner would take 3 as a cue in support of diamonds, I would not risk making that bid. 4 will not be confusing.
Not following anyone yet
.

Bottom Home Top