Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Sandeep Thakral

Sandeep Thakral
Sandeep Thakral
  • 0
    Following
  • 6
    Followers
  • 1
    Posts
  • 0
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
Feb. 16, 2012
Last Seen
Oct. 17
Member Type
bridge player

Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Your verdict
You don't believe West's story despite the sequences being in n their system notes as shown to director and submitted prior to start of tournament as mentioned in the thread earlier? That's interesting.
Your verdict
Let's look at what the law says - Law 75 C When the partnership agreement has been explained correctly, the mistake being the call made and not the explanation, there is no infraction. The explanation must not be corrected (nor must the Director be notified) immediately and there is no ...
Your verdict
So, I asked specifically about these two questions now - 2h by east and 3d by west. East's comment - a 2h by me wd be an active help try in heart given dbl (shortage game try diamonds) and pass are available. This is not what I want to convey. I ...
Your verdict
"both 2♣ and pass of 2♦ were alerted on both sides of screen, and it was explained on both sides (E to N at the moment he bid, W to S when 3♠ pass came to him which is when he asked) . That 2♦ pass is encouraging in this scenario ...
Your verdict
wd you allow him 4 if infact 4 were making and he passes 3? whatever he does he is in a fix and have the accusation of double shot because of a situation that is not of his making. He'd have been happy to have the ...
Your verdict
Cos he thinks he can make a game opp say Ajxx Axx xx xxxx or AJxx Jxx xx Axxx. Or even Axxx xxx Ax xxxx. Not even the best hands for druries. Also because he knows that in their pdship style his pd wd need an exceptional hand to bid ...
Your verdict
Well, you lose your bet - the explanation of 2 and pass of 2 is not in doubt at all, as agreed by opponents. Why would you assume something when you are being told that is not the case?
Your verdict
both 2 and pass of 2 were alerted on both sides of screen, and it was explained on both sides (E to N at the moment he bid, W to S when 3 pass came to him which is when he asked) . That 2 pass is ...
Your verdict
when did south get a chance to start with 3? over 1? Even a + bid - normal or not - requires an alert, which incidentally he did not have.
Your verdict
The agreement is that 3 is a raise in diamonds (as per his understanding of bidding), which requires an alert. Nobody said anything about 2 showing a game interest - specifically mentioned that 2 wd be the weakest action. Why would you be sceptical about a bid that ...
Not following anyone yet
.

Bottom Home Top