Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Ronald Vickery

Ronald Vickery
Ronald Vickery
  • 0
    Following
  • 0
    Followers
  • 19
    Posts
  • 0
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
Aug. 21
Last Seen
Nov. 27
Member Type
bridge player

Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Bill Segraves's bidding problem: AKQ5 Q75 AQJ7 J8
2D, assuming this is an "equal level conversion" bid. I owe partner a 5th diamond - just add it to my current debt.
Ronald Vickery's bidding problem: AKT42 T6 KJT QT8
Good point Jack. I'll do that in the future.
Ronald Vickery's bidding problem: AKT42 T6 KJT QT8
Partner's 2S bid was described as 8-11 total points. BBO's double algorithm perhaps needs to get a little spicier.
Leo Lasota's bidding problem: AK74 KQ952 J AQJ
Turns out opening 2NT on this layout would have worked well.
Ronald Vickery's bidding problem: AKT42 T6 KJT QT8
I was confronted with this decision on BBO (Free Daylong). I passed with the South hand & got a bad result - makes 3S while 3H does down 2. North's hand: S-xxx H-AKx D-Qx C-Jxxxx
Leo Lasota's bidding problem: J64 J852 AQ4 J72
With a death holding in spades and an effective 7 count (subtract a point for the 3 jacks), I'll leave it up to partner to reopen with extras. I'm assuming partner can give me this strength in the presence of a 3 level preempt based on Lawrence's ...
Leo Lasota's bidding problem: AK74 KQ952 J AQJ
2nd choice is 2NT
Stojan Vazic's bidding problem: K972 A2 K8762 62
Partner's shape looks to be 4441 given that LHO didn't raise hearts. My double fit & loser count says we belong in game.
Christopher Donnelly's bidding problem: KJ73 K72 AK65 65
See no reason to bid 3H unless I have a stiff club.
Johan Karlsson's bidding problem: JT96 Q97 --- AT9865
With diamond void, expect the opponents to give me the opportunity to bid spades later.
No followers yet
Not following anyone yet
.

Bottom Home Top