Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Paul Meerschaert

Paul Meerschaert
Paul Meerschaert
  • 21
    Following
  • 15
    Followers
  • 40
    Posts
  • 12
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
Jan. 4, 2011
Last Seen
9 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me
Game addict for as long as I can remember. At one time I was serious about Chess, Backgammon, Gin among quite a few other games. \nNow I pretty much exclusively just play bridge. \nAside from Bridge I enjoy my family, my "bud-bud" Kibitz, my Llapso Apso mix, reading, movies, racquetball, and I have become a bit of a gym rat these past few years. Though it hasnt done much for my expanding waistline. Maybe someday I will win that battle. Though just like bridge the enjoyment comes more from the battle than the victories! \n
Country
United States of America

Bridge Information

Favorite Bridge Memory
Making a XX small slam missing all 4 aces!....The joy of smiling at my wife and saying "I didnt" when she complained about my overcalling a 4 card suit, after she surprised me with 9 card support!!
Regular Bridge Partners
Bob Balderson
Favorite Tournaments
A special fondness for any national tournament - but enjoy them all!
Favorite Conventions
Fit Jumps....enjoy agreements much more than conventions though!
BBO Username
paulhaert
ACBL Ranking
Diamond Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Paul Meerschaert's bidding problem: 974 Q7 AK6 AT864
Good point Rob, it does not of course!
Andy Caranicas's bidding problem: 8752 KQJT8 AQ8 3
A good hand for Ripstra (Not sure I am spelling that right) Majors + a diamond fragment! I want to bid, hate calling a 5 card suit a single suiter, while the spades are anemic, I prefer giving more options to partner than 1 suit. Who knows sometimes partner drops me ...
Debbie Rosenberg's bidding problem: T3 8743 A8 K9862
As I play that a 5C bid shows clubs and a red suit, (4NT as one minor) I chose that. I think it is close to bidding as is. If I were playing with the more mainstream approach as you mentioned, I probably would pass. But holding my breath until ...
Ben Kristensen's lead problem: QT3 AQ75 542 Q75
and admiration for the Q of spades hitting the table!
Directors Ruling
I don't know if the responder is legally required to make a logical bid like 4H, or even 3D showing slam interest, and really is not the main point of this post, but rather I am submitting it in response to my partner being upset that it was assumed ...
Directors Ruling
That they would have bid 2S with correct information......I am not saying they should be allowed to change, only asking why not, as that was the logic used by the director in changing the score to +420
Directors Ruling
Openers hand was J10, 10x, AKxxxx, xxx, the opening bidder is a new player who stated they never even heard of flannery, and the 2H bidder is an experienced player whom I "suspect" bid only 2H in response to his partners facial expression. I was also very curious why the ...
Ben Kristensen's bidding problem: AK6 632 AJ7654 A
I voted for 2S only because at one time I played this bid as either natural, or a 3D bid with 3 hearts. This agreement was also in place on the auction 1D-1S-2H. While we never had problems with this approach, I no longer use this agreement.
Paul Meerschaert's bidding problem: Kxxx AKQxx Ax Kx
Yes there is, sorry I missed it
Joel Wooldridge's bidding problem: AK872 Q8654 K3 A
If you do choose 3D, which I did (admittedly wavering between 3N and 3D) My feeling was that with values in clubs partner was less likely to have the AQ of diamonds, and if partner had x, xx, AQxxxx, Q10xx or something similar they would likely bid again. All conjecture ...
.

Bottom Home Top