Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Jordan Lampe

Jordan Lampe
Jordan Lampe
  • 11
  • 5
  • 109
  • 0

Basic Information

Member Since
June 17, 2015
Last Seen
4 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

Random brige player in New York City.  If you like backgammon, check out my site:

United States of America

Bridge Information

BBO Username
ACBL Ranking
Bronze Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Stefano Merlo's bidding problem: 32 QT842 QJ7 J74
Pard has shown a max with good heart support, why would you want to bid 4NT natural here?
Hand formatting
Usually when the hand viewer reacts like that, it's because you've inadvertantly told it the wrong person is on lead.. maybe the dealer was wrong or maybe there was a skipped pass or something in the auction.
Jordan Lampe's bidding problem: Q8432 KQ985 --- A73
For this particular problem, 4 would show that you've forgotten the agreements. As noted elsewhere, the agreements may not be optimal.
Jordan Lampe's bidding problem: Q8432 KQ985 --- A73
If half of Responder's high cards are in diamonds, do you want to push to game anyway? Kxx x AQTxx QJxx would be a GF for many but looks pretty dicey in 4S.
Jordan Lampe's bidding problem: Q8432 KQ985 --- A73
The theory behind the methods is that with a GF w/o slam interest, Responder just bids 4. The theory behind 4 for "all accepts" is that usually 2NT was just a game invite, so Opener doesn't reveal unnecessary information, but yet leaves Responder a couple of ...
Jordan Lampe's bidding problem: AKQJ7 JT5 T862 6
Why? Don't you have a 4 card fit for one of partner's two shown suits?
Steve Osiecki's bidding problem: 85 AKQxx Kxx 742
It's surprising that the partnership has such detailed understandings about this but doesn't know whether 2 is forcing or not.
Bridge Discipline and the IOC
I suggest you read and you will see much outrage over the fact that a pair that is widely believed to have cheated had their conviction overturned by the CAS. I think we would all be interested to know how the EBL is entitled ...
Please rank these choices
I look at the choice that got the most votes, that's #1. I look at the choice that got the second most votes. That's #2. I look at the choice that got the third most votes. That's #3. It's not rocket science.
Please rank these choices
Maybe we should get rid of bidding polls since nobody uses them. Or maybe it's "use a bidding poll if your question is unimportant because only a fraction of the BW users go there, but if your particular bidding question is important, then post as a general article."?

Bottom Home Top