Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Jonathan Steinberg

Jonathan Steinberg
Jonathan Steinberg
  • 10
  • 41
  • 49
  • 1

Basic Information

Member Since
July 15, 2010
Last Seen
18 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

Check out my photos at:


Bridge Information

Regular Bridge Partners
Alex Hudson, Mike Kenny, David Sabourin
Member of Bridge Club(s)
Hazel's Bridge Club
Favorite Tournaments
Penticton, Puerto Vallarta, all Mid-Atlantic Regionals
Favorite Conventions
ACBL Ranking
Platinum Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
ACBL Club Department
There is no good news coming out of Horn Lake. I chatted with Carol on FB this afternoon. She was polite and friendly as always. Employee morale was not good before her job "being eliminated" and now it is worse. In the field, ACBL Tournament Directors (TDs) are equally unhappy ...
How Angry Should We Be?
One avid bridge playing friend of mine (a Grand Life Master) is a vociferous critic of the Soloway KO format at Regionals and has started boycotting some tournaments that advertise them. She calls them a "cash grab". In a normal KO, if you win (or survive a 3-way), you advance ...
How Angry Should We Be?
I'm playing here at the Richmond Memorial Day Regional. Great people, great hospitality. Awful KO tournament schedule. A major part of the problem, IMHO, is lack of guidance from Horn Lake to Tournament Chairs. So the schedule becomes a free for all. ACBL TD's are working every week ...
Memphis NABC+ Appeals Cases
What happened to the Appeals from the Vanderbilt matches? did I miss them?
San Francisco NABC Reservations Now Open
That was the number one complaint... having to take a cab to get to restaurants. There were not enough to service the bridge crowd
San Francisco NABC Reservations Now Open
Birmingham should never have been approved for an NABC. Not because of the hotel but because of the lack of restaurants. That was the number one complaint.
This isn't "Just bridge"? USBC Appeal #2
You have more room over 2H doubled. 2S is the weakest response. Relay and 3S is Invitational, direct jump to 3S is Forcing (5+). Jump to 4S would probably be a 6 bagger, no slam interest.
This isn't "Just bridge"? USBC Appeal #2
Sorry, no! Leaping Michaels is a direct 2M-4x. No double. My mistake.
This isn't "Just bridge"? USBC Appeal #2
Your exact agreements are not the issue. The issue is that you have agreements and know what they are. An expert highly paid professional pair should have agreements and system notes to back them up. That said, South, a high level expert player, has to "play bridge". Trying to win ...
This isn't "Just bridge"? USBC Appeal #2
I couldn't agree more. At the highest levels should it not be mandatory to have written system notes which must be made available if there is a dispute? I have played against professional players who are in the Top 10 of the Barry Crane Top 500 on a regular ...

Bottom Home Top