Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Jim Munday

Jim Munday
Jim Munday
  • 198
  • 140
  • 156
  • 21

Basic Information

Member Since
July 27, 2010
Last Seen
14 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

Living near Memphis, frequently found on BW or BBO.

Part-time engineering consultant; sports enthusiast, and puzzle maven.

United States of America

Bridge Information

Favorite Bridge Memory
Making KO round in 1st US Trials experience
Bridge Accomplishments
1st 2013 Fast Pairs, 3rd Platinum Pairs 2015, 2nd 2013/2015/2019 NAP Flt A, King of Bridge 1984,
Regular Bridge Partners
Sue Munday, Larry Sealy, Richard Pavlicek, Richard Oshlag, Alex Kolesnik, Bill Hall
Favorite Tournaments
Favorite Conventions
BBO Username
ACBL Ranking
Grand Life Master
Paul Linxwiler - Jim Munday
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Alex Kolesnik - Jim Munday
Copy to my cards View/Print
Mark Bartusek - Jim Munday
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Dave Smith - Jim Munday
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Richard Oshlag - Jim Munday
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Larry Sealy - Jim Munday
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Paul Munafo - Jim Munday
Copy to my cards View/Print
Two interesting deals from the Unit Swiss last night
How do they know unless they've seen my hand? I've bid 3N with 3 of responders 5 card major many times. The spade shift is not necessarily fatal either if they are 4-2 and i can knock out the red ace that has length. Of course that doesn ...
considerably worse than trivial
How about combining the 2 (Magnus's 4 hits & Gwodzinsky)? A KQ54 JT9876 32 I've not looked for the hits previously (but will start now) but I have had a couple Gwodzinsky's over the years noted due to having an interest in statistical oddities such as that at ...
Jim Munday's bidding problem: Kxx QT9x x Qxxxx
This was actually an opponents problem. Opener hitched (agreed on) over 3 , this hand bid 3. On site poll was unanimous for 3 (“automatic”) so was allowed. 3 would make, 3 is tricky, a DD make IIRC but likely down 1 (which is what happened ...
Entering leads on Bridgemates
@Ed reppert I mean that corrections of contract, results etc are commonly required. Changing the lead would just be one more cause. If not bothering to change an incorrect lead, what's the point?
Entering leads on Bridgemates
I've seen results listed with leads that could not have been made (the purported hand on lead didn't have that card and that includes declarer vs defender directions). I've also see random cards selected or generic spots (i.e. rather than specific spot also put 2) If ...
Stephen Tu's bidding problem: JT8xxx 98xx Ax x
@stephen tu 1 not in my book , if shortness strikes gold slam can make opposite our yarborough (not advocating that). Im not a fan of 2D 0-7 to be sure, that will be almost every hand 2 i usually play 5 level cues show 6 card support , but i guess ...
Stephen Tu's bidding problem: JT8xxx 98xx Ax x
We have made a "negative" response and hold 6 card support, a singleton AND an ace. Pass is unfathomable to me.
Stephen Henry's bidding problem: KTxx QTxx Qxx Ax
Since i can't possibly have a GF hand opposite a 3rd suit opener, the method description is debatable. I will choose 2N here suggesting a max PH with 4 trumps, leaving room for opener to wiggle.
David Fraser's bidding problem: --- KQJT643 85 9643
i can think of few things less attractive to me than passing 1 but one of them is now bidding over 4.
That's Rare!
No, the error is mine. Looks like i misread your post. However, I was not trying to be critical as much as seeking clarification.

Bottom Home Top