Bridge Winners Profile for Ian Rowlands
Basic Information
- Member Since
- April 13, 2012
- Last Seen
- July 17
- Member Type
- Bridge Player
- Country
- Australia
Bridge Information
- ACBL Ranking
- None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
- Ian Rowlands's bidding problem: AKT5 87 QT8 JT83
- That's what I thought (i.e more likely to have diamonds). My partner has a gift for having the opposite suit to what I hope for!
- Ian Rowlands's bidding problem: AKT5 87 QT8 JT83
- Because partner didn't double, he has less than 16.
- Ian Rowlands's bidding problem: QJ984 T7 AK7 A74
- The last hand you described is almost what it was (the HCP and singleton club are correct, 1 extra ♠ and 1 less ♦). Slam makes on the finesse on of K♠ being right.
- Ian Rowlands's bidding problem: T AKJ7 JT732 AQ7
- What would the continuation be over 4♦? Assume it isn’t an AKQ holding.
- Putting together a Strong Club (Precision) - any insights into why and how these issues matter?
- Not really - probably a bridge too far for any partners...
- Ian Rowlands's bidding problem: AKT5 Q K75 AKQ86
- Any tools you suggest? Don't think Kokish covers this. What do you mean by SFA?
- Ian Rowlands's bidding problem: J75 J42 AK7 AK82
- I always thought it would require a ♥ stopper. I know the actual bidder thought that!
- Ian Rowlands's bidding problem: KQ86 9 QJ6 QT763
- Really? Where I play, what I do is leading edge! But I didn’t know it had changed (or has it only for top flight players - I’m not one of them and never will be!). Don’t suppose you have any online references for this change so I can ...
- Ian Rowlands's bidding problem: KQ86 9 QJ6 QT763
- Which aspects seem like from 1985? Given a weak NT has been chosen, I thought the rest was close to standard for most people these days.
- Ian Rowlands's bidding problem: KQ86 9 QJ6 QT763
- I'm glad there's no issue with the double, as that is what happened. There is a follow up problem, assuming double was chosen - that one is harder!
See all comments
No followers yet
