A sequence of calls (lebensohl and then cuebid-stayman) can never be a comparable call. The first call itself must be comparable.
I don't know how many times I've been having this discussion. The law (23A2) does not care about a subset of hands. The law only cares about ...
Then he will ask what will call a show now, and call b, and call c and so on for every call the player might want to make. The player is entitled to know if his next call will bar his partner or not and it's the TD's ...
Not at all, the TD takes the player away from the table, asks what he intended to show by his call, asks what calls the players thinks are comparable in there methods and the TD will either agree it's comparable or not. So when the player returns to the ...