Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Ed Reppert

Ed Reppert
Ed Reppert
  • 9
  • 24
  • 26
  • 2

Basic Information

Member Since
July 17, 2011
Last Seen
8 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Director
about me

Retired US Navy Officer. Know a little something about computers (was my secondary job in the Navy). ACBL Club director. Player. Systems: Mostly I play 2/1 these days, but I like Romex and Precision as well. Play mostly in clubs and local tournaments.

United States of America

Bridge Information

Favorite Conventions
Boston Jacoby.
BBO Username
ACBL Ranking
Non Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Ban Collusive Cheaters For Life
I believe so.
Ban Collusive Cheaters For Life
I don't recall signing anything like that during or after my twenty years of active duty. There is a (tacit, I think) acknowledgement that I'm subject to the UCMJ, but I don't recall anything like what you're suggesting. Of course, I'm getting old. Maybe I ...
2C Response with 2/ 1 Hand (maybe GF)
"Most conventions require an alert (or a delayed alert if over 3NT). So when the Alert charts shows there is no alert for "2/1 responses that promise invitational or better values", that assumes a NATURAL response." Not sure I buy this chain of logic. Why should it (I presume ...
2C Response with 2/ 1 Hand (maybe GF)
Hm. My dictionary defines "artificial" in the bridge sense as "conventional, as opposed to natural". I'm not so sure that's correct. If I'm wrong about that, my answer to your pop quiz (which would have been "artificial") is correct. If I'm right, and they're not ...
Honolulu BRP 7NT Lead Discussion
How do you know that, Andreas?
2C Response with 2/ 1 Hand (maybe GF)
"For sure it's alertable" would have been my guess too, but it seems we're both wrong. See my post above.
2C Response with 2/ 1 Hand (maybe GF)
On the Basic chart, Item 2 under responses is "any game forcing response at the 2 level or higher". On the Basic+ chart, item 2 under responses is "any game forcing response". The above are bids that are allowed. On the Open and Open+ charts the only responses that are ...
Ban Collusive Cheaters For Life
"the US Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty (theoretically the most severe punishment) should not be imposed on those who were under 18 at the time of their crime(s)" Should not, or may not? Case reference?
Ban Collusive Cheaters For Life
And yet they were still allowed to play.
Ban Collusive Cheaters For Life

Bottom Home Top