Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Ed Reppert

Ed Reppert
Ed Reppert
  • 9
  • 23
  • 26
  • 2

Basic Information

Member Since
July 17, 2011
Last Seen
4 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Director
about me

Retired US Navy Officer. Know a little something about computers (was my secondary job in the Navy). ACBL Club director. Player. Systems: Mostly I play 2/1 these days, but I like Romex and Precision as well. Play mostly in clubs and local tournaments.

United States of America

Bridge Information

Favorite Conventions
Boston Jacoby.
BBO Username
ACBL Ranking
Non Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
NABC Contracts
It's a Holiday Inn. Maybe folks asked the wrong question. Or maybe the third hand report I got was just wrong. I do know that (as I said elsethread) someone did offer a room, though I don't know who, that is, I don't know whether it was ...
NABC Contracts
In fact, someone (not sure who) did offer their room, and the offer was taken up.
NABC Contracts
Attended a regional yesterday. One of the players had a medical problem. A doctor told him to go lie down. Some people went to the front desk and asked if the hotel provided a room where the patient could go do that. The hotel said no, and these people then ...
Director, please!
Some people prefer to play games by the rules unless the rules cause them to get a bad score.
It's About Time
What the hell, just eliminate the [i]whole[/i] law book, and let people do whatever they want.
It's About Time
I meant "hysterics" in the sense of "people who are hysterical".
Club UI problem
I can't speak for anybody else, but when it's my turn to call, I consider a lot of possibilities. Some I might reject as not systemic given whatever system I'm playing, some I might reject because they make no sense whatever system I'm playing, and some ...
NABC Contracts
It took me a minute or two to figure out that "F&B" refers to "food and beverages". At least, I think that's what it means. You didn't say. :-(
Director, please!
Whether 2 was or was not alerted is not in evidence. That said, you're right that an alert that was not expected and did not happen does not transmit UI. Nor does an alert that was expected and did happen. Either might be the case here; we don ...
Director, please!
I don't see how something ("waffle") that previously existed but exists no longer is relevant to a ruling, or a discussion of a ruling, under the current laws.

Bottom Home Top