Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Derrick Browne

Derrick Browne
Derrick Browne
  • 0
  • 4
  • 3
  • 0

Basic Information

Member Since
Sept. 25, 2014
Last Seen
June 18
Member Type
Bridge Teacher

Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
A dog made LM?
Ellis, there is a Director Javert enquiring after you, said something about you being number 24601.
In what universe ....?
The final pass clearly indicates R was suffering fatigue. Can someone please flag this post for quarantine to the C forum. BW is less strict there, so it may be allowed to allege that R is not fit for office.
A dog made LM?
Given the modern trend towards eliminating waste, I might as well recycle my comment from last year when non-human competitors were also discussed (and Georgiana illuminated us about I Ron Duke): At the Australian National Open Teams some years back, Whip Scampese was captain of the Best Mixed Team, but ...
Seeking tips for playing against BBO robots
Kevin's comment seems contrary to the earlier suggestion that they will not blank honours?
Bad Claim Case from San Francisco
if I remember scripture class right, Solomon offered to split the difference if unsure whose baby it was, and some wise directors do the same. "Two down or making both seem possible, let's call it one down." "Most improper," protest the righteous with their love of the laws, or ...
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder
Yeah I see your point, four loser hand so more like nine tricks. :-)
SiVY: A Story of Youth Bridge Success - Part 1
Your program is an inspiration. I look forward to your next instalment. Congratulations to you and the others.
Ok. A stupid question on a Wednesday evening.
I'm told that in the finals of an Australian National Championship, against 7C, the player made the traditional lead of a trump, in this case the jack. Declarer won the CQ and banged down CA on which the opener leader's CK fell! Partner watched speechless as declarer rattled ...
Is the double a comparable call?
No Dan (and Kieran and others), no need to return to the earlier law, but how about this: the offender may change to any call; the inadmissable call is UI for partner; and ANY possible disadvantage to the non-offenders should lead to an adjusted score. Say RHO deals and (as ...
Is the double a comparable call?
More important IMHO is how we can fix the laws for 2027 to avoid the need for these debates. Allow such changes of call but adjust the score if benefit is gained from non-comparable actions.
Not following anyone yet

Bottom Home Top