Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Craig Zastera

Craig Zastera
Craig Zastera
  • 0
    Following
  • 23
    Followers
  • 143
    Posts
  • 0
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
June 28, 2012
Last Seen
2 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

Retired software engineer (Microsoft), living in Woodinville, WA.

Have played bridge since high school (starting 1965).

One national championship (Silver Ribbon Pairs) and a couple of 2nds in under 5000 national events.

Country
United States of America

Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
Diamond Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Chris Chen's bidding problem: AK QJ KQJT53 AKT
Over 4, opener should bid 4. A clearer way to indicate interest in a slam but lacking a control I cannot imagine.
Donald Lurie's bidding problem: K974 J872 K4 AQ7
Partner doesn't have "xx" in s or anything similar to that (e.g. "xxx"). Partner has :Kxxx or something similar.
Bill March's bidding problem: 54 A54 AKQJ6 963
I consider 1 clear-cut and 1NT horrible. It's not so much that I'm worried about having only 14 HCPs. It's that 1NT openings with *2* wide open suits are to be avoided if there is any reasonable alternative.
Donald Lurie's bidding problem: K974 J872 K4 AQ7
4 doesn't have to make, but I think I must bid it with my excellent "help." Even opposite, e.g. AQxxx-xx-xx-Kxxx (which I regard as very minimum for partner's bidding), 4 needs little more than finding A onside. I don't stop off to cue-bid ...
Russell Samuel's bidding problem: xx xx AQxxx Qxxx
4 is forcing (and slammish) so not appropriate with this OP hand. 3 is also forcing and seems like best choice with this hand. If opener rebids 3NT, great (i.e. I pass). If he rebids 3 or 3, I bid 4 which I think ...
Russell Samuel's bidding problem: xx KQx Ax AKTxxx
Not only is 4 forcing, but it shows definite slam interest. A good way to play this 4 is "QKC" (Quantitative keycard ask). That means opener responds keycards "Minorwood" if opener "likes" his hand for a slam in context. But if opener wants to back-peddle and discourage ...
Craig Biddle's bidding problem: A5 J KJT954 T843
I play transfer advances. They do not affect NT advances which remain natural. On particular OP auction, playing transfer advances: 1N: natural 2: natural 2: s (transfer advance) 2: strong raise (LR+) 2: weaker raise 2N: natural, invitational 3/3: fit jumps ...
Jacob Freeman's bidding problem: 76432 63 AKJT6 6
Pass would be OK. But not 2 planning on 2 over (2) later as that would show a good hand with 4=6 (maybe 4=7) in our methods. We always show our 2-suiters (5+-5+) right away, so bidding differently shows some other shape. I don ...
Sathya Bettadapura's bidding problem: 3 9654 AQJ7 KQJ5
I would never bid 3 with this hand. IMO, the choice is between 2 (natural, not promising extra values, denies 5+ s) and 3 (splinter in support of s). I went for the splinter raise despite its being space-consuming. xxxx-A-Kxx-Axxxx opposite is enough for slam.
Timuçin (Timo) Erkoç's bidding problem: 9642 632 J962 A8
Too weak for a 2-level negative double IMO. 2 seems like plenty.
Not following anyone yet
.

Bottom Home Top