Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Anthony Golding

Anthony Golding
Anthony Golding
  • 1
    Following
  • 0
    Followers
  • 1
    Posts
  • 0
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
Sept. 10
Last Seen
Sept. 20
Member Type
bridge player

Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
The Fallacy of Restricted Choice
Roland, you did it wrong! You say that East held a stiff spade honour or both spade honours. That is not consistent with Robson's deal. East does not have a stiff spade queen because he won the first finesse with the jack. Please do it properly and report back.
The Fallacy of Restricted Choice
Paul, that is preposterous. I thought we were talking about bridge not some fantasy game were Paul gets a redeal if his finesse loses.
The Fallacy of Restricted Choice
David, what a good idea! A thousand deals would be significant. Surely, lots of members can do the simulation. If you can, please, please do it and report the results here.
The Fallacy of Restricted Choice
Thank you Josh. Sanity at last.
The Fallacy of Restricted Choice
Paul,I think the way ahead is for you to propose the terms. Please be precise on the conduct of the deal. I suggested that we keep dealing until one of us has had enough. You might like propose another way conclude the exercise. Finally you should propose the stakes ...
The Fallacy of Restricted Choice
Roland, what on earth do you mean? We shuffle, deal the 22 cards and accept the result. Then we shuffle again, deal and get another result which we also accept, and so on and so on.
The Fallacy of Restricted Choice
Ulrich, if you dispute my exposure please tell why I am wrong.
The Fallacy of Restricted Choice
Cornelia,"Of course Mr Golding is wrong"...that's the pot calling black! I am certain because I have exposed the Reese-Bird fallacy. What makes you certain?
The Fallacy of Restricted Choice
Paul,let's do it. Hopefully the outcome will put an end to this debate. Of course you can specify East's strategy. I suggest that we include the J in the deal and discard any deal where West has both Q and J. Do you agree? How can we ...
The Fallacy of Restricted Choice
No! When East wins with the first finesse with the K, he did not have the singleton Q. So East's original holding was either KQ or K and the second finesse is roughly evens. Do you agree?
No followers yet
.

Bottom Home Top