Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Andrzej Matuszewski

Andrzej Matuszewski
Andrzej Matuszewski
  • 30
    Following
  • 16
    Followers
  • 266
    Posts
  • 258
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
July 21, 2012
Last Seen
an hour ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

Statistician with interests in: sociology, history, psychology, pure mathematics, ecology and MUSIC

Country
Poland

Bridge Information

Regular Bridge Partners
Jerzy Orysiak, Tadeusz Skalski, Roman Krzemien
BBO Username
mata2015
ACBL Ranking
None
subjective Standard Polish Club
Copy to my cards View/Print
make this slam.
But for this line also 9 would be welcome. Without one needs to calculate chances.
make this slam.
May be we should play spades instead diamonds first. Because if they are 3-3 we win even if clubs are 4-0.
make this slam.
Sorry! To play through hearts in case clubs are 4-0 I have to have 9 in dummy, but I do not have.
make this slam.
But I can win through ruffing hearts.
make this slam.
First I cash A - this seems to be necessary. Everything else depends on exclusion 4-0 split.
Andrzej Matuszewski's bidding problem: AT3 KQT87 QT3 Q7
We are at MPs. Of course 2NT WAS controversial. But we ARE in a decision position after pass of pd. I'm not sure how pd will interpret rdbl. But after such bid N has to say something...
Gabriel Carrasco's bidding problem: QJT97 A AQT85 J6
In practice I'd consider the Hamman rule...
Andrzej Matuszewski's bidding problem: AT3 KQT87 QT3 Q7
Frances is a person I need!. This is a pick-up partner. There was no discussion what we do after the interference. You can assume: points (but not too much because it is not forcing). 3- spades because with 4 it would redouble. 2 hearts in case of my minimum.
Benny Abramov's bidding problem: T943 --- AJT96 KJT2
2 = cue bid with fit?
Percentage play to find the Queen in 6!H?
"Shoking" or "absurdal" move can be the optimal. In such positions one can try to look for other "normal" moves that are "at least equivalent" to the "absurdal" one. I understand such approach from psychological viewpoint but not from scientific one.
.

Bottom Home Top