Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Andrzej Matuszewski

Andrzej Matuszewski
Andrzej Matuszewski
  • 27
  • 16
  • 224
  • 258

Basic Information

Member Since
July 21, 2012
Last Seen
13 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me
Statistician with interests in: sociology, history, psychology, pure mathematics, ecology and MUSIC

Bridge Information

Regular Bridge Partners
Jerzy Orysiak, Tadeusz Skalski, Roman Krzemien
ACBL Ranking
subjective Standard Polish Club
Copy to my cards View/Print
Andrzej Matuszewski's bidding problem: AQT A63 AJ32 AT3
2NT is too weak, 4 is too strong. There is a speculative bid 3... We can assume that pd does not hold K. But he can have kings in hearts and/or clubs. May be with jacks....
Andrzej Matuszewski's bidding problem: AQT A63 AJ32 AT3
From the discussion above I understood that there was third fault: I do not distinguish second and fourth hand positions, after they open.
Andrzej Matuszewski's bidding problem: AQT A63 AJ32 AT3
I can tell you the truth of reality while preparing polls and articles (not only for BW). 90% of articles were born not as reports of my brilliancy but rather as analyzes of catastrophes. In this deal I made 2 errors (or bad decisions). I bid 1NT instead of 2NT ...
Andrzej Matuszewski's bidding problem: AQT A63 AJ32 AT3
1. I did not like x in the first round. This is why: W N E S(me) 1 p p x p 1 p 1NT p ? In this position pd knows nothing. 2. Returning to the reality of the problem. There are two possible interpretations of pd ...
ALL ACTIONS!!!!! Bidding 2NT N-GIB knew that he is going to finish in 3, which can be easily doubled. Our 3 can be easily played on 4-3 fit with their division 1-5. Their 2x seems less dangerous for NS. It is worth to make simulation for comparison ...
I made several simulations, projected another ones and made some "advanced simulations". All of them were very interesting. This hand is a material for new simulations. One learns a lot making such research... May be we will introduce a scientific corner at BW...
Any arguments in favor S's 3 do not convince me! To support my point 3 one has to make a simulation.
3 after N's 3 is a STRANGE bid in my opinion. There are MANY arguments against such bid. 1. If N has 2 stoppers in spades, why he did not pass the double. 2. If N has 2 stoppers in spades and a very weak hand then ...
Let me present my point. Especially in situation when public vote is clearly against me. It was not necessary that W opens 2. I agree that this bid is most standard, but standard does not mean that 2 is obligatory. Standard bid does not mean: safe bid or ...
But comparing with other normal tables 3 or 4 would still be very close to 0% score.

Bottom Home Top