Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Anant Rathi

Anant Rathi
Anant Rathi
  • 70
  • 58
  • 173
  • 219

Basic Information

Member Since
Dec. 27, 2011
Last Seen
9 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

I am a bridge addict. There, I admitted it. That's the first step, they say.

I moved from San Diego to San Francisco in April 2016. No regrets (yet).

United States of America

Bridge Information

Favorite Bridge Memory
This auction: 2NT (3S) 4S (P) 4NT (P) 5D (P) 6NT (P) 7D. Made 7 missing a cashing ace
Regular Bridge Partners
Glen Perry, Ben Bomber, Ankur Rathi, Phil Clayton, Mark Leonard, Jesse Chao, Nate Munger
Member of Bridge Club(s)
QuickTricks, Adventures in Bridge
Favorite Tournaments
Favorite Conventions
1430 RKC, inverted minors, Jacoby 2NT, Multi-landy, OGUST, Unusual over Unusual, Flannery
BBO Username
ACBL Ranking
Silver Life Master
Precision, 2/1, variable 1NT
Copy to my cards View/Print
Chuck Messinger's bidding problem: Q9 KT8743 2 J642
"six-four, bid one more" ?
Defense is hard
It's been mentioned that we could have projected AQ-tight to partner, in order to get a suit-preference signal, by winning the A at T1. The problem is that if partner led from K9X32, then after A-Q-shift, partner will of course assume diamonds aren't running and may choose ...
Defense is hard
This has been a fascinating subthread to read. I just have one comment: "I'll grant that the falsecard can't cost if declarer has 4 diamonds, but it isn't the sort of falsecard that most declarers make" Couldn't disagree more! I think it's routine for experienced ...
Anant Rathi's bidding problem: 43 982 KQ85 AK32
Can’t partner be 6=4 in the majors?
1M - 1NT - 3NT. What is your treatment for that rare bid?
C'mon David...
Pete Marvin's bidding problem: T2 864 AKQT AQJT
Pass. And for God's sake, don't panic! If you don't get another chance, that's just how it goes
Rowland Reeves's lead problem: AJ32 K3 JT KJ754
I probably shouldn't be asking but...what's the problem?
Anant Rathi's bidding problem: T9532 AQ2 AT QJ5
Richard - Bill was speaking as opener, holding AKxxx xx KQJxx x Partner bid 4, so now "whatever partner's black suit concern..." I disagree, though. We already showed the entire hand with 4
Anant Rathi's bidding problem: T7xxx Qx AJTx xx
I described it as a picture bid in both places. "Stronger" is in quotes because it is not meant literally. What's the problem?
Jenish Shah's bidding problem: ATxx AQJxxx --- KQx
I choose the splinter, as 5 is out of the question if undiscussed. This hand is a rock-crusher and I intend to bid again (5) is partner signs off

Bottom Home Top