Join Bridge Winners
Bypassing 1 and bidding 1NT with a balanced hand without a major

Assume partner has opened 1 promising 3 cards, and we are responding.

 

In Walsh style bidding, when holding diamonds and a major in a weak hand, the diamonds are bypassed. However (to my understanding), with a weak balanced hand with a 4 or 5 card diamond suit and no major, 1 is the standard bid.

 

But why not bypass 1 and bid 1NT? Through this,  we win the (matchpoint) race to 1NT, preempt the fourth hand from a cheap 1M overcall, and describe our shape and strength fairly tightly right away. However, we might miss a diamond fit, and the weaker hand gets to declare notrumps.

 

Specifically, I am talking about the following shapes:

5(322)

(32)=4=4

3=3=4=3

Consider a hand that you evaluate as 6-9 hcp. What do you think about bidding 1NT instead of 1 with these shapes?

Please select up to 5 choices.

Good with 5(332)
Ok with 5(332)
Bad with 5(332)
Good with (32)=4=4
Ok with (32)=4=4
Bad with (32)=4=4
Good with 3=3=4=3
Ok with 3=3=4=3
Bad with 3=3=4=3
Depends on honor distribution
Depends on strength (for instance, I bid differently with 6-7 than 8-9 hcp)
Depends on scoring (MPs vs IMPs)
Other

Sorry, to answer polls. Registered users can vote in polls, and can also browse other users' public votes! and participate in the discussion.

Getting results...
loading...
27 Comments
Getting Comments... loading...
.

Bottom Home Top