Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Thomas Berg
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Dear Peter Jan!

I was joking - I was not insulted.:)

And I did not make my conclusion on this single example.

So - no offense!:)
Nov. 7, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Dear Peter Jan!

My conclusion he is cheating is based on ALL the examples shown by Kit and other bridge detectives. Not on only one example! Come on - are You trying to insult me?!
Nov. 6, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Dear Peter Jan!

Please explain to me why my statement is “ circular reasoning ”. :)
Nov. 6, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If he was/is an expert he did not need to cheat! I do not regard him an expert - so he hoped for clubs to behave and come to 4 tricks and the 5 sure tricks in the other suits.
Nov. 6, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Dear Ron!

No-it is the other way round!

It is because he knows that partner is weak he uses 2 min. to think - and then he bids 3NT hoping for a miracle.

If he did not know partner was so weak then he would have bid 3NT in 5 seconds!
Nov. 6, 2015
Thomas Berg edited this comment Nov. 6, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
And the russians even put his( Abel not Balicki! ) portrait on a stamp in 1990!
Nov. 6, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
According to my “Polsko - Angielski” word book both “rzekomy” and “domniemany” means “alleged”. The books are from 2009.

And my polish wife say the same! :)
Nov. 1, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Strange!!

Instead of giving relevant facts mr. Martens quotes a poem by Max Ehrmann!

I know some poetry too - but not relevant for this thread! :)
Oct. 31, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
My partner and I signal were simple:

1.When partner leads an honor you show attitude ( UDCA ).

2.Or else only count ( UDCA ).

It works fine - and never any TD called for! :)
Oct. 27, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
There is something I do not understand!

Mrs. Jessica Piafsky has stated and written several times here on BW, that the polish team was treated terrible by the other teams in Chennai. And even against this bad treatment they won. And according to Jessica Piafsky she is very close connected with the whole bridge world and specially the polish team.

And now I read (according to PBU) that most of the players and teams were supporting the polish teams decision to play!

And Jessica Piafsky still has to tell me and other readers if she thinks mr. Gawrys was cheating after partners hesitation 6min.26sec.

Reading her own definition of cheating mr.Gawrys was cheating!
Oct. 26, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Dear Martin!

So you prefer to lose this way - and being a very nice and popular fellow not following the rules!? For sure popular with your opponents! :)

And in my opinion declarer did not see the blockade!

Oct. 26, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Dear Christian!

But when you have been playing a hard tournament the last 5-10 days - then mistakes come just like in other sports! Because you are more or less exhausted.

And you are allowed as opponent to question declarers claim - maybe he was tired and made a mistake because of this!? Just like in any other sports tiredness is no excuse for making mistakes!

And you are allowed as opponent to take advantage of this - just like in any other sport!

Would you like to lose because of wrong claim from opponents?

So forget all the beautifull words about fair play! You can still give fair play without being naive!
Oct. 26, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hi David!

How do I/we know what is going on in the head of declarer? ;)
Oct. 26, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
IMHO you can never blaim any sportsman for following the rules!

But of course a sportsman is allowed NOT to follow the rules (and pardon the opponent) WITHOUT being blamed for that. This is what we most of the times call “fair play”.

The coin has two sides! ;);)

Oct. 26, 2015
Thomas Berg edited this comment Oct. 26, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hi BB!

In your example (soccer) the teams have made a mutual and well accepted agreement to wait until both teams are ready to go on. This we have seen during the last 20 years.

But in the 7NT there was no agreement to accept a wrong claim - probably because declarer did not see the blockade.

So there is a big difference.
Oct. 26, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Reading the dispute about the wrong claim in 7NT I realise, that bridge seems to be the only sport where some of the players want to allow their opponent to make another try/attempt when he has made a mistake.

Imagine in football when a forward misses a 100% chance - does he get one more try because “we do not want to win this way”?

Or in tennis when player misses a 100% smash? One more smash chance?

Come on - we want our game to be regarded as a sport. Then we must play according to normal sportsrules.

When declarer did not make a claim mentioning the club blockade it shows that he has not seen/observed the blockade. One more chance? IMHO no!
Oct. 26, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I play with my partners during the last 30 years - only count showing against all contracts higher than the 4-level!

Believe me - it works fine!!
Oct. 20, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Sorry - but still Klukowski? :) :)
Oct. 19, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Dear Jessica!

And the second question - did mr. Gawry in your opinion cheat by using UI from mr. Klukowski?
Oct. 19, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Dear Jessica!

You still owe me 2 answers ( and you always keep your word you write):

1. Did mr.Gawry (in your opinion) after partners 6min.26sec. hesitation cheat.? Did Mr. Gawry use UI?

2. How can I find you on FB.? There is no Jessica Piafsky on BBO.

If you do not want to answer my questions then just tell me - and I will not ask anymore!:):)
Oct. 19, 2015
.

Bottom Home Top