Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Tansu Aksu
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
apparently they ate at the same restaurant at the same time:)
May 21, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I think making them(or anybody) to pay the “cost of the investigation” may create “unnecessary” questions about the process and even the verdict. What if the decision was very close and then EBLDC said well let's find them quilty otherwise we have to absorb the cost. Why not just make them pay a fine instead
May 21, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
and they should get purple points
April 14, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
since you didnt start with double, partner may or may not think you are playing for slam and grand. + I don't play exclusion w/o prior support.
April 8, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
parter's double may move them from 3NT to 4D. Not every 2 aces should double IMO.
April 4, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
What's wrong with bidding 2cl instead of 1NT?
April 4, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Agreed. Just the other day i was explaining to my partner that I normally wouldn't opened that bad 11 point hand, but they were playing strong club

I think even lighter openings are Ok against any type of strong club/Fantunes etc, and has to be marked properly in the CCard
April 4, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Declarer with Kx will play the K, partner with Kx(or Qx) will lead the K(or Q) and play club. So one of them has Kxx or Kxxx. Win T of clubs lead 7 of clubs back. Hope partner has the Kxx
April 4, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
ay ay ay! i just couldn't figure it out yesterday. you win
April 1, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hi Gary, I just didn't know how to create a bidding problem in the first place - as an highly paid IT Consultant!!!. now i know
March 31, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
yes now i know how, thanks. i just didn't know how to do it before publishing it and can't delete it
March 31, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
or 6-0 no just kidding
March 31, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“Refuse to answer” is like voting for the green party - not anything wrong with that but you got the point
March 31, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
what if i was only interested in hearing 3 options; double, 2h or pass? publishing as a “bidding problem” allows users to pick 18 more different options. Let's meet in the middle; next time i publish this i will add two more options ;“i refuse to answer” and “publisher didnt know how to create a biding problem”
March 31, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
ok. i'll create a poll question about if i should delete this or not
March 31, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
if there is no enforcement, why bother? Do you guys know any ruling that using or not using the stop card made difference?
March 31, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
it's called, you win some you lose some. If 4sp went down you wouldn't called the director i guesseh? - i know it's not the point but… who plays suport double at 3 level anyways?
March 31, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
did you use the stop card?
March 31, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
i think it was “A preempt that is known always to be weak is a blunt sword”
Nov. 14, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I agree as well. However sometimes you don't want to open 4 in 1st,2nd seat in case you miss 3nt, and sometimes you don't want to open 4 in the 3rd seat because they will possibly get to 4 anyways, so you open 5 instead. So that's the challenge, maybe variable openings can help but don't know any
Nov. 13, 2015
.

Bottom Home Top