Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Stefan Olausson
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 26 27 28 29
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
a) I have asked BBO to remove that annoying 2NT bid (just answer 2 instead and let opener describe)
since there is no possible way to locate a 4-4 fit in any suit after that.
All 3-level bids after 2NT show 5+suit.

b) The other issue “everything is natural and shows 4+suit”
yes, it's a disease seriously contaminating the whole GIB-system.
Particularly, after a 1-level opening, there are tons of GF situations
where new-suit bids stupidly just show “4+suit”,
even when in the earlier bidding, you have already denied that suit.
I don't believe this will ever be fixed in the current robot implementation.
Sept. 23
Stefan Olausson edited this comment Sept. 23
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thinking again, the first double should not be garbage-stayman after overcall, so then shows invite+.

Then pd denies 4-card major, so we can just pass 3.

Still not sure I will have an easier decision next round, though… :)
Sept. 23
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
:)

What distribution did west have for “rescue”?
Sept. 23
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
but in imps-pairs, this tactic would then seem to come in only in the later stages of the event, when you know you “need swings” to win —- same as in normal MP-tourneys, if you are ONLY interested in winning, rather than placing in the top-X, or so.

Otherwise, if you start bidding “mildy anti-percentage” from board one, odds probably are you have rather destroyed your chances during the first half of the tourney or so, and will just have to suffer through….
Sept. 21
Stefan Olausson edited this comment Sept. 21
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I agree with that!

And since you should not mix them,
the rest follows….. ;)
Sept. 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Your Q was just whether it was NT only – that's what I answered to.

When do you think udca gains?
And when does it lose?
Sept. 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Not necessarily.

In a suit-contract, for example, pd might lead K from KQTx and declarer ducks from Axx in dummy.
I play low from from Jx, but high from xx.
Sept. 20
Stefan Olausson edited this comment Sept. 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Ok, I'll try a more generalized argument :)

Given a 2-card suit, if your top-card is “useful” (i.e. helpful to pd), it's usually OK to encourage by playing the lowest (UDCA).

If the top-card is not “useful” you can usually afford to throw it away and discourage (UDCA).

if you play std-carding, you will mostly be restrained to playing your lowest card regardless of what you have (2 might mean 32 or H2, you play the same card from both – while in UDCA I play the 3 from 32 and pd might notice the 2 is still out).
Therefore, less information transmitted in the signal.

How abt that? :)
Sept. 20
Stefan Olausson edited this comment Sept. 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“What about when it's H9? Isn't that just the same thing problem in reverse attitude?”

Well, you can never play other cards than the ones you were dealt.

In UDCA, you play your LOWEST card to encourage (not necessarily a LOW card, if you havent got one). Pard will see some (but usually not all) of the remaining cards, and needs to make his conclusions/probability-estimates regardless of what method you use.

So playing “std signals”, 9 (lowest card) from H9, technically still means “discourage”.
Sept. 20
Stefan Olausson edited this comment Sept. 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Either that…. or they might figured out something I didn't :)

I would still think, if you are not world-class, one does well not to mix.

By the way, what percentage of world-class pairs play such mixed approach?
Sept. 20
Stefan Olausson edited this comment Sept. 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Your friend couldn't motivate WHY this was so?
Might be easier to discuss if we knew what the supposed reason would be?
Sept. 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
>I have always played Normal Count and Reverse Attitude signals

They don't mix well.
Either you should play both “std”.
Or both UDCA.
Sept. 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Isn't the most obvious example when you have only two cards?
Say, T2?

This is why I cannot understand how anyone wants to play “std count”…

Or, for that matter, if you want to encourage from H2.
After a “std signal”…. Oops, you have nothing left to encourage for!
Catch-22 :)

My conclusion: UDCA is much more logical.
Sept. 19
Stefan Olausson edited this comment Sept. 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
At my work-place (1000+people), they use middle-name initials to distinguish people with the same first+lastname.
Sept. 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Without looking at my actual hand ;)
my second double clearly looks awfully like a penalty-X.
Would not do that undiscussed…
On the other hand… what the heck would I have bid instead? :)

Anyways, over the XX, think I trust E-W at this vuln and bid 4C.

Glad this one isn't IMPS, cannot get worse than 0% here! :)
Sept. 19
Stefan Olausson edited this comment Sept. 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Tough one…. people might not appreciate getting a BW-name like:
“Richard Fleet #2”

:)
Sept. 19
Stefan Olausson edited this comment Sept. 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
what would you rather prefer?
Sept. 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Could it be the same user logging in with facebook on one device and with google on another?

Or 2 different individuals?
Sept. 19
Stefan Olausson edited this comment Sept. 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
@Barry
it's still a bit weird, if it is differently implemented in different clients….
Sept. 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
hmmm….
you may have discovered an unintended bug there… ? :)

(I seldom played that form)
Sept. 18
Stefan Olausson edited this comment Sept. 18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 26 27 28 29
.

Bottom Home Top