Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Selena Pepić
1 2 3 4
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks, corrected.
Dec. 25, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Opener is AQxxx Q Qxxxx Jx opposite Txx Axxx x Kxxxx so double dummy there is 3. There is also 3.
Nov. 16, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Sorry, I changed.
Nov. 16, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
-Double is not strong, w/o 3 hearts, most probably 0/1 hearts. No 10 cards in minors. Kind of balanced without hearts.

-4NT would be pick a game from some two. So on 5 I can bid 5 which would be 6-4, and 5 directly would be 5-5.

-What is auto-forcing? If LHO bids, it is NF. So we can stop in either clubs or hearts under the game here.

-Yes. That is reason why 5 doesn't make. Diamonds are 4-1 and hearts 4-2 so player can ruff a diamond from T9xx. If he doesn't it goes on clubs which are 3-2.
Nov. 5, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I think that the last line shows how many people voted so far.
Oct. 31, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I think adding one more option is the only way to fix the first one. As for the second problem I don't think there is a way.
Oct. 31, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Yes, I did not state my arguments for bidding redouble, you are right and I do have more information. I still think partner should always bid 3 with 5 clubs when I redouble. What I wanted to say is that I know that partner will never bid 1NT had, even if I don't know what is the lower bound for my opponents points.

With your second point I completely agree, that is why I don't want to guess if my partner has 3 or 5 clubs and my opponent bid 2 just to put us level up possibly.

When I say no special meaning, I thought about “no special meaning except what is usual”. I am not sure that this is usual, but I can make another poll. What would you bid on 2?

I think that north might double with some of 6331 hands as well as that south may bid 2 with let's say Kx xxxx xxx xxxx. I am not saying it is usual, I am just saying that it is possible. I am talking about them not having fit and their final contracts being 2 and 2.
Oct. 9, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I agree with idea that redouble should be clear but I thought this redouble is clear. The thing is that I am still not sure neither that partner bids 3 always with four cards nor that my partner still can't have something like 6133 and absolute zero. The longer the spades are, the greater probability that he could pass 1 doubled with good spades and hand like this so I expect to see AKQJx in dummy. Also if south has something like 2434 I would expect him to bid 2 with zero.

Actual board was:

N: AKQxx A9x Kx Q9x
S: Jxx QJxxx xxx Jx

So 2 is making on a heart lead. Or you do blame your partner for not bidding 3 (or not leading spade/diamond).
Oct. 9, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
For me 1NT seems like impossible bid. Double from north is likely to be 16+, knowing my RHO really well, she probably has 18+ (:

So imo probability that partner has more than 4-5 points tends to zero, especially when partner is a conservative player as mine was.

I didn't like 3 bid immediately as partner can easily have 6223, and 3 doesn't promise any points. I didn't like 2 as I don't feel that strong (yes, sounds impossible when you have my hand).

In that moment I supposed rdbl shows that I can stand playing 2 (I don't think that I can but I wanted to show that) and that I have points so partner can decide what is right. I think redoubles shows close to what I have and 2 can be from 3 to 5 cards so I am asking partner to bid with 5, decide with 4 and pass with 3.
Oct. 9, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I completely agree.
Oct. 6, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Michal, I only said that with 4 spades and 5-6 clubs South can start with double. I think a lot of people use this approach. And I didn't say everything is forcing, but everything is forcing after partner bids 3.
Oct. 4, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I thought you play something like that but what do you do with 1363 without a heart stopper or too strong hand to bid 3NT, no solid diamonds. If you start with 3, what does partner do with 4324 and no heart stopper as well?
Oct. 4, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I am not the one supporting that x promises 4 cards, but the other method has as many disadvantages as this one.
Oct. 4, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I agree with that, but does any of those bids set diamonds as trumps?
Oct. 3, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I have the same question for you as I mentioned above, how do you bid hand A xxx AKT9xx AQx opposite KJTx x(x) Qx(x) Kxxxx 4135 or 4225?
Oct. 3, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I disagree. If South begins with 3 should North bid 3NT with both heart stopper and 4 spades or 3? If he bids 3 partner will not bid 3NT without a stopper. This also answers your second question. If he has Qx or Qxx in diamonds and 5 clubs and if he can't be sure about number of diamonds his partner has, why would he bid 4 rather than showing a 5 card suit in which they might have fit.
Oct. 3, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I agree with first part. And when I wrote last train for spades I thought it is obvious that I mean spades/diamonds or clubs as diamonds and clubs are two other options.
Oct. 3, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Yes, I will probably put that as a next problem. I was thinking if someone plays this as a pass because double posts problem with 3-P-P which I don't know how to solve (in this situation 3 comes as only option I like for those who play 3/3 as 5+ cards in hearts GF but in this situation there is option on third level, in others not really).
Oct. 3, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Yes, I knew you would say that. That's why I offered other hand. I mean I am trying to find out what is difference between bidding 4 on double and 3 followed by 4. I don't think both should be “really good diamonds”.
Oct. 3, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
What should North bid with x Axx AKT9xx AQx if partner can open any suit with 4-4 in minors or (as here he can try 3NT here) what should s/he bid with A xxx AKT9xx AQx?
Oct. 3, 2018
1 2 3 4
.

Bottom Home Top