Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Ronald Kalf
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Even without Gazzilli I‘d bid 1N without thinking about it.
May 30
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I‘m not sure, but if I want to review the bidding, I simply ask to leave the cards on the table. If it‘s pards lead, I ask him to lead face down.
May 30
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
We play spiral scan, so 5 asks K (5 K, 5 s/o). Even with K confirmed you cannot be sure about 7. I‘d bid 7 sort of last train in our system. Pard now knows the value of 3rd round control in , but with a source of tricks in would bid 7 even with Kxx.
May 30
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Okay, you convinced me concerning X, but I still don‘t know about 2N (and 2 over 2).
May 30
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Like it or not, that was the bid!
May 30
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It all depends upon your overcalling style, I consider the N hand a lot above average. OTOH even opposite my overcalls S is close to another move. Anyway, did Annie ever have to sleep on the couch? A piece of good advice: get Annie to buy you a decent couch for your next birthday.
May 26
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Depending upon the regulations in effect it‘s either switched off or in silent mode, but can be switched on if necessary.
May 26
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Lets ask K&R and Danny Kleinman. You get 13.85 resp. 13+. My rating (FYI, but not as important as the other two) is 14. Sounds like 1 to me.
May 26
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
„There is no such thing as “the actual agreement” in this case (unless North-South can show that there is)“. I can always show our actual agreement because I have it as eBook on my smartphone.
May 26
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I double 6 and hope pard can double 6 because I would pass it.
Edit: come to think of it, my partner will bid 6 if he can‘t double 6:-)
May 24
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
E action should be based upon the information given and pass. Then S is likely to bid some number of , probably 3. The X and yummy. If you don‘t believe the explanation, don‘t complain later.
I had this situation when playing behind screens for the first time:
The tray was not in a normal angle which let me believe that my partner opened 1 (polish) followed by an 1-overcall (I should have seen the green card between 1 and 1), I alerted my 1N and explained it as „6-9, semi-balanced, doesn‘t promise -stop“ per agreement. I don‘t recall the rest of the bidding but opps ended up in their normal 4, no harm done. Now my screenmate called the TD and wanted to roll back to 1N X -5. I explained why I bid 1N and I can only assume that he (a German top player) knew that all along. He kept insisting for 10 minutes that the Td should give a corrected score before he gave up.
May 24
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You decided to bid 4, now stick to it.
May 21
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I pass because pards reopening bid will tell ME more then I can tell HIM/HER with whatever bid I choose.
May 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Sad, I'm a big fan of Kit.
May 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I wouldn‘t call those penalty doubles, a semantic problem.
May 13
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Depends upon your methods. According to my book the bid is 2 showing a defensive limit raise or better. Playing NFB 2 is out of the question of course. 3 (natural and forcing) is an alternative, but tends to show a misfit. I‘m not really afraid of 4 but if N bids 4, I must double without being able to show -support.
May 12
Ronald Kalf edited this comment May 13
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It isn‘t the first time that I ask this question: „please define penalty double“. For me a(ny) penalty double is „pard I expect you to pass unless you have an extraordinary hand“. I don‘t expect that a „penalty double“ of 1N is exactly that, so what is it?
May 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Ken and Craig, IMO you miss the point, the one Ken mentions only shortly.
IF 4 SHOWS A HONOUR YOU ONLY BID 4 WITH A HONOUR. PERIOD.
Sometimes you get a good result because of bad bidding and vice versa. When I analyze boards, it‘s not all about bad scores, I care about doing the right thing within the framework of our agreements.
May 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I want to play against the Big Clubbets as much as possible because I‘m the most aggressive bidder in our team and avoid the WNTers as much as possible because I hate WNT (when played by opps). However if the Big Club comes with the WNT, I take both.
May 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
4/ as an artificial slam try for / and not just in this situation.
May 9
.

Bottom Home Top