Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Ronald Kalf
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
How about 1 forcing, 2 and 3 non-forcing?
July 15, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Business! I've played WNT with a runout system most of my life, but XX was always for business and often led to juicy penalties. I think runout makes sense even with SNT, but I do not play that in my regular partnership and with a pick-up there are issues that are more important.
July 15, 2016
Ronald Kalf edited this comment July 15, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I like that, what are your continuations? It should be possible to find a possible 4M, 3N or 5m but you should also be able to stop in 4m.
July 12, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
With 0 hcp it is a preempt, with an ace and a king it is a limit raise.
July 11, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Don't preempt a preempt!
July 9, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I rate this hand as 7+ More optimistic then K&R whete it is 6.45. I'm happy to pass.
July 9, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Ah, but now responder can bid 3/ as a natural slam try, 3with a 5crd and 3N as a wish to play 3N but without a -stopper, 3 is an artificial slam try in . Opener need not bid 2N of course, but the higher the bid, the more precise the information should be. 3N: No -fit, probably a stiff, a good -stopper, not a good hand for slam.
July 9, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Why has pard bid 2? I can see 3 reasons: a) looking for a 5-3-fit, b) missing -stopper or c) interested in slam, could be , or . If you consider only a) and b) it would be okay to bid 3N with -stopper and no -fit. But if you also consider c) wouldn't you want to have more information?
July 9, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Wouldn't you simply bid 1-1; 2N with that type of hand?
July 9, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You can add Multi to the list
July 8, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
We play “New Stuff” from Jeff's treaty. Unfortunately “New Stuff” is a very short chapter.
July 7, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
No Roman Jump Overcalls for my partner ;-( In Germany we cannot play NTO because a 1N-overcall must either be natural or show an anchor suit of at least 4. We play Baron promising 4OM over 1M and Raptor over 1m.
July 7, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It means whatever you agree to, but it should give a very clear picture of your hand.
July 7, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
That is our current agreement. Doubler is supposed to bid 3 with a minimum in which case he always has at least a doubleton. This is somewhat comparable to 1N-(2Y)-2N. The difference is of course if doubler has more then a minimum and bids higher then 3Y. Now there is no way to ask for a stopper and 2N-bidder need not have a stopper as doublers bid is forcing.
July 6, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I am well aware that my 4 is a minority vote. Our agreement is that it explicitly shows a void, minimum in hcp, good and support. In this special sequence we do not splinter with a stiff, because 3N still could be the best contract (not in this case of course) and would simply bid 3.
July 6, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
1 (or X on their 1) 3-suited with both M, 1 2-suited with both M (pard should bid as high as possible). 1 4-5!m or 1-suited, 1N same with , 2m natural, 2M 5M-4m, 2N both m's.
July 6, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I play (in a Polish Club variant) 2S is a splinter raise to 3, 2N is either a -splinter or a 3-bid with 3crd (3 asks, 3 p/c).
July 4, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The Romex I know (and played) uses CONFI to ask for CONtrols and search for a 4-4-FIt with sufficient controls for slam (Super-CONFI for grand slam).
July 1, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Well, if yo force game with a lousy 15 hcp plus 3 for a singleton, you must pass with a lousy 6 hcp hand. I rate responders hand as 5+ and openers hand after a 1-response 17+. That totals 23- not enough for game. Playing 1N 11-13 has the effect that 1-1M; 2M always shows extras, either in hcp or distribution. 3M would be the value of 18-19, splinters stronger. Even then you hardly have your 1M-bid, but iv you choose to bid, at least you play 3M, not a hopeless 4M.
July 1, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Why use Gerber at all? With two balanced hands you need to know the number of controls (A, K). With an unbalanced hand you need to know the number if key cards. In my partnership 4 is never Gerber, but a jump to 4m is minorwood if 3m would be forcing or we can establish an FG in another way. With a pick-up I try to avoid Gerber because it is likely to lead to to misunderstandings. I would accept Kit's alternative, but then 2-2; 2N-4 is likely to be the next exception and pard could come up with further situations where (s)he thinks it is only logical.
July 1, 2016
Ronald Kalf edited this comment July 1, 2016
.

Bottom Home Top