Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Rohit Gupta
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 91 92 93 94
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Lol. The 10 was the unblock(to me it's just denying the Q). Taken along with the 3 discard it's a request to cash out. They may have 10 tricks in the minors, as the second wasn't ducked, the declarer must have felt it's odds on to bring in 11.
17 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The OP is above reproach as to his conduct at the table. Though I can't understand why he has posed this query here. Unless there's a wager( non monetary) involving NS and the OP.
Oct. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Lol
Oct. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
From this one thing is clear that N was alerted about the 2 bid or else the pass of 3 doesn't make sense. Deposit to be returned along with interest taken from NS.Result stands as it's obvious EW have over bid.
Oct. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
MS that is south's problem.
Oct. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
12+HCP. Sorry. Oh and four card support.
Oct. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Prefect! Thanks.
Oct. 14
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Uppercut neat, but how does one work it out? If that or the heart shift is the way to go. It's up to east to decide if the 7 is gold.
Oct. 14
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It showed a second suit.
Oct. 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
East did have
3 controls :)
Oct. 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Only hurricane issues.
Sept. 26
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I was East. But you could be right about what they must have been playing.


OTOH it's not a 9 or 10 trick game which one is aspiring to, it's a 11 trick game. Rules have to be bent a bit.
Sept. 26
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
For example, so many play inverted minors forcing up to three of the minor.

Okay to respond to you, the 3 bid could have been 3 to show more surety about opener having slightly better than a weak opener.
Sept. 26
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
3 card support and the controls to my mind warrant a bid.
Sept. 24
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
1X+1680 Mans that was scored once out of all the tables it was played at.Scores for the board.
Sept. 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It's either that or one has to push the boat a little more than is safe with 3.
Sept. 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Easy negative X to begin with. And an even easier X at the end.
Sept. 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
LOL. True. must be NS non vul at the least.
Sept. 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Scores: 1X+1680, 2X+660; 2X+650; 1X+630; 1X+620;1X-200(we), 1X-500
Sept. 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The scores: 1X1010;5X+980,1X+500,1X-50(we) :)
Sept. 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 91 92 93 94
.

Bottom Home Top