Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Randy Thompson
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I prefer to play transfers over their 1-level take-out doubles. Here I would redouble to show 4+ diamonds and then bid 1 over their 1 if partner passed it unless our agreement is that the diamonds-then-a-major sequence forced game, in which case I'd have bid 1 to show 4+ spades instead of showing the diamonds. Over the diamonds-showing redouble, partner likely would have bid 1 with 3 diamonds, 2 with four, 1 with four if they passed. Over 1 it goes exactly as it would have gone had I bid 1, forcing and natural. I stop the transfers at a transfer to 1N (showing 6-8 OR 12+ HCP). Bidding 1N can be a way to show 9-11 constructive. Transferring to 1N then rebidding a lower-ranking suit (or taking any free bid in a competitive auction) is the way to force game with length in that lower ranking suit. This replaces the power-showing redouble, at least when your length is in a lower ranking suit or you have no length worth showing.
April 6, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I have been accused of “bidding like an illegal alien” (no green card). And now I'm trying to convince my nationals partner that we need to open flat hands one HCP lighter than now because we pass too many hands. :)
April 5, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Is the partnership desk still open?
April 5, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
We play 2N is Minors (weak or strong) or diamonds (strong). We learned it with 2S “size or clubs” as “Boston Jacoby” back in the early 1970's. Good idea – but not original.
March 28, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
No.
March 28, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Wow– we just went back to Westy's to have their catfish for the second night in a row and it was fantastic. We remembered it from 2012 as fantastic. But food poisoning is scary.
March 25, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If you are going to bid 3N with only Qx in LHO's bid suit, you have to be able to do it “in tempo.” I'm not saying faster than usual, but I am saying that if you do it slowly, it won't work.
March 24, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Warm, but not the boiling hot that our age group often demands. VERY good room for playing, BTW. Quiet, enough space, enough light, bathrooms close and adequate to handle the demand, free coffee and temperature is bearably warm.
March 24, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Overcaller is the only one in the partnership who knows whether he bid 4 to make. Impossible for him to force a preemptive raiser in that context!
March 22, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“I've Been Living on the Wrong Side of Memphis” by Trisha Yearwood is a favorite of mine.
March 21, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“Chicken EHAA” used 3 as a strong forcing bid. Or you can just bid games at the go. Or you can play that 1X is forcing but not necessarily strong?
March 21, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
How about being in game opposite some average 6 counts? If you back your judgment and rebid 2N over pard's 1 response, he won't be passing 2N with a decent 6 or any 7, much less a dreadful 8 count. Do you want to be in 2N opposite pard's 5 count? How about 3 opposite his 5 count and 5 bad hearts? Pard will invite game with a “decent 8 count,” at least at IMPs.

I think many/most who think this is too strong for 1N plan to rebid 1, especially over a 1 response. Now, far from having shown a flat 18, the hand will have been lumped in with shapely 10 or 11 counts with 4-5 or 4-6 in the blacks. Poor partner is then being treated like a mushroom (fed BS and kept in the dark). At least 1N is respectful of partner, as it makes him captain, knowing within a jack of how many walrus points we have and knowing the location of 8 of our 13 cards.
March 20, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I guess Bridge Winners must be a weak field chock full of walruses. :) At this point, the vote is 42-16 in favor of opening 1N. Maybe everyone is out of step but Johnny? Lucky for me that when playing 2/1 these days, or when playing Meckwell Lite, my opening 1N range is 14-16, so this is a non issue.
March 19, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Rebidding 1 with this hand seems to me to be both an underbid and a misdescription of shape. 2 rebid seems both an overbid and a misdescription of shape. A 2N rebid works over a 1 response, but over a 1 response? Opening a flat 17 count with a 15-17 1N, however, just gives us a chance to have an extra ten spot in our opening bid for once in our lives. This is matchpoints, where finding a game with a bad 8 count opposite a good 17 count isn't as important as protecting our plus and staying with the field. IMO, we should try to beat them with our play, not by going all in on an anti-field opening bid choice.
March 19, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You would “go out of your way” to randomize the result being compared to other tables? Really?
March 17, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Or ignored.
March 17, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Ah, the recurring disagreement about take-out doubles and about how strong overcalls can be. :)
March 17, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
What else should 2 show than a spade fit and invite+? Didn't our double say we have spades? Now the cue says we have enough power that we might have a game even opposite a hand that could only bid 1.

With other strong hands that don't have 4 spades, we might have overcalled 1N or rebid 2N here or overcalled 1 or 2 or even pass. Do we not have spades and also not have red stoppers? I see no hand where we need to cue 2 here where we shouldn't have done something other than double or couldn't do something other than cue bid now.
March 17, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You make those doubles too? :) That makes this for sure a competitive part-score hand, where it is more important than ever to raise to 2 so pard can decide what, if anything, to bid over 3/3. Shame does not relieve you of your duty to tell partner that you have 4 spades and that he is captain at the three level.
March 17, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Lesson common to these claim polls is: NEVER claim. Let them stew, even when you have all top trumps.
March 16, 2019
.

Bottom Home Top