Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Mike Lipkin
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Wow…definitely a large brunch!!
Oct. 25, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The Bertens note illustrates clearly a flaw in the laws.I have read Love many times and might still f*** up a compound (or simpler) squeeze at the table. Claims on hands with a hitch: specific play sequences, or blockages or overtaking,or ruffing high, should require an affirmative statement of play without which the claim should be judged invalid. In other words, the claimant should affirmatively point out the hitch.
Oct. 24, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Signor Rona please resign.
Oct. 22, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
to saverio and kenny: in the original KS there were controlled psyches and the ACBL convention card included a checkbox for controlled psyches. i do not know the acbl regulations, but these seem to have disappeared. my question to you both is the following: suppose someone had on his CC the following 1NT (3d seat): 13-15 OR 0-5. would you consider that permissible? i also seem to recall (but may be wrong) that when soloway was playing ATTACK, zia and michael had an issue with “controlled” psyches there as well. Can you both/either enlighten me and express your opinions?
Oct. 13, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Too bad you slept through 6 crisscross by Joel
Oct. 6, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I have made this suggestion elsewhere but I believe it bears repeating: The only way to guarantee a vigorous purging of cheaters and no political interference is to have a permanent, independent, self-financed ethics commission within the WBF with a mandate to remove demonstrable cheaters and not beholden to the other board members. Removing someone from this committee should be difficult, like impeachment, perhaps requiring a 2/3 public vote.
Oct. 2, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Fabulous Avon. Did I mention that Sepp Blatter will join the WBF board when his current job ends?
Sept. 29, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
excellent summary for the lay public- except FN cheated on defense.
Sept. 28, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
VA… You are making an equity argument-which may be compelling. Yet, it is another matter to simply say: if you are caught cheating now, you lose all prior titles. That is simply a penalty assessment. BTW, the NBOs could choose to strip titles from cheating pairs without penalizing teammates whose ethics are not questioned. It would be funny but not impossible to say Sontag-Weichsel won the Teams (with no awarded teammates).
Sept. 28, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Perhaps Martin Winterkorn will take up bridge in his retirement. (satire warning…please don't take seriously)
Sept. 23, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
For this to be true, a fourth “retiring” squad must be one of the three other originals to qualify. (obviously)
Sept. 22, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
yes… I misspoke… I should have said available to men in the open game. in any case i am simply relaying the impression that these experts had that there was more money available to expert male pairs.
Sept. 22, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I thought about this and asked2 world class NY expert women players. Both were too polite to suggest women were more honest than men. The much greater monies available in the men's game did come up.
Sept. 21, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Bravo Roy and Sabine. Very stand-up.
Sept. 19, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hi Gary. Why would info from 36 years ago still be secret and who makes that determination?
Sept. 18, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Some cheating methods- Reese-Shapiro comes to mind- allow a pair to make better sacrifices in the bidding because they know partner has value or length in a specific suit. The sabermetric issue here might be net imps per sacrifice and frequency of sacrificing, or it might instead be net imps per 5-level contract. In any case not an easy thing to parse as an Offensive Statistic.
Sept. 17, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
In my post “personal wbf reply” i suggest a permanent investigating committee not beholding to the WBF executive be formed…similar to the bridge police others have suggested.
Sept. 17, 2015
Mike Lipkin edited this comment Sept. 17, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I am not critical per se of his fairly prompt reply. I did think the BW audience would like to see a response to the natural concern of no official statement.
Sept. 16, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
One might care to compare and contrast the relationship of the WBF to world bridge with the structure of the IOC, FIFA and a host of international sports federations to their sports. All have been or continue to be rife with corruption as they are a focal point for money and few power-wielding individuals. It seems that the only hope is a radical reformatting of such institutions. My suggestion is that a completely independent ethics and financial oversight committee be permanently established within the WBF with a fixed budget (to prevent politically motivated defunding) and a mandate to confidentially accept any evidence of malfeasance from any source and pursue and ultimately (if true) publicly announce the results of its inquiries.
Sept. 16, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
.

Bottom Home Top