Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Matt Foster
1 2 3 4 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
So declarer seems to be marked as 1291.
(Partner ditches high low in hearts, and odd spade, then 2 more hearts).

My man came down to Qx A — Q worries about a stiff SK with declarer, but that isn’t really any good as declarer will cash the 9th diamond and stepping stone squeeze us.

Happily, as perhaps the carding and bidding indicated I had started with 4=6 in the majors and had come down to Kx in each major. When declarer exited with a heart I was down to Kx K.

Partner, a premier grand master, and occasional frequenter of this site chose to lead Q to trick 11, missing not only the stepping stone that didn’t exist, but also the pseudo fratricide squeeze this inflicted on me, who really didn’t think I’d have any decisions to make on this hand, and needed to hold onto the correct last 2 cards. Perhaps fatuously I reckoned that if partner had Q of spades left he would have exited with it, and thus discarded the K playing for the much more unlikely possibility of this deck having started with an even number of hearts in it.

So declarer started with
X
QX
AKQJT9xxx
X
June 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If declarer has stiff K, doesn’t he need K as well to be cold on the triple strip squeeze thingy?
June 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
What if declarer started with a stiff K?
June 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If anything, it's standard SP, at least in isolation.
Partners known 10 major suit cards can be distributed in any way between the 2 suits, as long as there are at least 4 in each,
This does seem rather like a count position, partner knew declarer started with (at least) 11 on top before making his first pitch.
June 6
Matt Foster edited this comment June 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Added in, in case it makes a difference. On the next diamond partner will pitch the 2
June 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I bid whichever thing shows 3Hs (3NT?)
June 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks, fixed
June 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I’ve no idea why f the traffic volumes, but this feels high to me, and I do IaaS optimisation professionally. AWS isn’t always the best answer dependent on the workload characteristics.

I’d be happy to donate a couple of hours to assess the cost effectiveness of the current setup.

SendGrid, last time I looked, was significantly more expensive than Amazon SES which does the same job.

Matt
June 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I’m not sure I know what is going on here, but that hardly matters with three aces.
May 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Mostly by playing kickback turbo (4T+1). But you’d better have good rules as to when it’s not Turbo, especially over diamonds.
May 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I can remember your convention card from the YC, under special notes it read:
No we don’t have any strong openings
No we don’t keep the bidding open on rubbish

I’ve done similar in a serious IMP partnership (in seats 123 only), but using “rough 2s” in the minors with no horrible results that I can recall; maybe we just got lucky and only picked up monster hands with no-one pre-empting in 4th seat.

Certainly the net gains were positive.

Oh yes, we did have a 3NT opening as “I can probably make this, in some comfort”, and a 21-23 2NT.
May 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Ian, who broke tempo when? I suspect East over 4 but the narrative doesn’t quite support that as you seem to have been in both seats….
April 29
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hands like this explain which minorwood/kickback/redwood et al exist.
March 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I bow to your superior memory/correlation.

Not that either of us bid 6 either
March 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Quite possibly. Some knowledge of opponents might sway me.
But it’s surely more likely opener is 5=6=0=2.
March 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Whichever honour asks for kount
Partners card and the number of in the dummy should tell me what to next, assuming I’m still on lead
March 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Clubs. Balanced hands of 16+ start with a double.
March 1
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Even if a raise promises 4, and denies a WKNT it’s still a pass.
Feb. 21
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Given that there was only a courtesy raise with 2red available, why should we expect any more than Qxx and a card opposite?
Feb. 21
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
My objective is to go plus.
Reese wrote about picking up 13 clubs and spoke of objectives.
Secondary objective is to make the last guess belong to the opponents.

Partner can see the colours, and will know the value of (non-heart) aces.
Feb. 21
1 2 3 4 5
.

Bottom Home Top