Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Liam Milne
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You are playing an aggressive junior
Aug. 28, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Well, I was going to find a 3 bid next over partner's 2NT, but I don't think he gets much blame for jumping to 4.

I found a better line than both suits breaking, but I didn't make it…
Aug. 27, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Wow. Did not expect a third of voters to pass out 2!

I bid 2NT and everyone passed. The lead was the A, and dummy put down (please comment on dummy's decision):

AJT64
53
T632
T5

opposite my

Q
AKQT8
Q75
AK84

The play was somewhat satisfying. At trick two, LHO shifted to clubs around to the Q and A. I played four rounds of hearts, LHO pitching a diamond and a spade as RHO won the fourth round. A club was continued to the 4, J and 10, and the 9 of clubs came back around to the K.

Now I cashed a heart and a club (LHO pitching 9 and J) to leave:

AJT in dummy

opposite

Q and Q7 in hand. The correct play is left for the reader to complete ;)
Aug. 22, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The reason I didn't poll players on Bridge Winners is because a) the average membership of BW is likely not in the peer group of the player in question; b) the poll results wouldn't arrive in time (the ruling needed to be made within the hour)
Aug. 13, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Apologies, edited to reflect the (agreed) hesitation
Aug. 11, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The difference for me was that 4 might be useful as natural in our current auction. Not many are suggesting that though.
July 21, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Sorry Ed I don't understand your comment - what part of our agreements (aside from the question) aren't defined
July 20, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I should have been more specific in my question. Clearly there is no objective/standard meaning to the bids in the auction above.

I am more interested in what bids should mean in a regular expert partnership. I would be interested in the ‘specific agreements that are all artificial’ mentioned above.
July 20, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Yes, I would double 3.

Partner's double just showed values, I assume. I don't think partner would risk bidding 4 now with a slam try - it's probably not 100% forcing, although unlikely to end the auction.

I don't think a third double (of 4) should have been penalty from partner. It seems too important to be able to double for takeout, despite it being the third double. This means I am discounting the chance of partner bidding 4 with diamonds and a major - that hand would double for takeout.

Sounds like partner has single suit diamonds and a decent hand but not quite enough to insist on game. I have enough for game - if I thought partner was forcing I would perhaps bid 5, but that feels like an overbid if 4 is NF.
July 18, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
How do you resolve the huge difference between 1 and 2 after bidding 3 with both?
June 22, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Ben - how can opener have spades when they raise 2 to 3 in this auction? Wouldn't opener have already rebid 1?

Edit: just read your comment above. So with KQx x AKxxx Qxxx you would raise to 3 rather than bid 2NT?
June 22, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I played an embarrassingly bad line at the table so you really don't want to! I'm convinced by winning in hand and playing a club, which one seems a little complicated but small to the 10 likely best.
June 21, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
No, I don't think so. Maybe if they thought that game was not on even opposite 22-23 balanced? Haven't really thought much about it.
June 19, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thank you for your detailed work on this Wayne.
June 19, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hans - Phil Markey isn't being serious with his comments above :) Normal Australian banter
June 18, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
OK Michael, fair point. It would be better to say either “the hand record reveals that 6 could make double-dummy” or “looking at the North-South reveals that 6 had play”. I won't dig my hole deeper by committing to either of those though! I think we can both agree that 5 is better than 3NT in any case.

Thanks for your other comments.
June 18, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You're right Peter - it is a great photo! Thanks for letting me know about your ownership of the photo, I wasn't sure who to credit it to. I have sent you a private message.
May 30, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Not the wrong question for me, Eric. I think getting the 2 bid in is more important than worrying about the problems later. But I do still have to deal with the problems later; hence, the poll!
May 17, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
No. But how would you bid it playing XYZ?
May 6, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hi David, what's pfa?
May 5, 2018
.

Bottom Home Top