Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Larry Sealy
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 31 32 33 34
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I would also only bid 1. In my younger days, the decision would be between 2 and 3, not 1 and 2.
Nov. 21
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Tommy Sanders, I believe.
Nov. 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
That's basically the crux of the problem for me. If I thought my question distracted him, I'd give him a chance to take the Pass back. If not, the pass would stand. I guess I would have to be there to determine the answer.
Nov. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I'll transfer, then bid 3. If partner then bids 3N, I'll try 4.
Nov. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If no way to show a 2-suiter, I'd have overcalled 2. That would leave me an easy 4 now.
Nov. 15
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Do I have any way to distinguish between good and bad raises? Namely, what would 2N by partner have been?
Nov. 15
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Haven't seen you at a tourney in awhile, John.
Nov. 15
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If K lead could be from A OR K, how would you find out if your partner has the J (or even A), when you don't have the J? And if the lead could be from AK or KQ how does partner how what to do with J?
Nov. 13
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Marty,

I would double with that shape (depending on the hand), as well. But I wouldn't bid 2. I'd pass 2 and hope for the best.
Nov. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
All are correct, but 3 could be no shortness with 6 card sppt for minor, though rates to have shortness. I don't think I've ever bid it w/o shortness, but I can envision Kx in partner's major and 6 card support for the minor and just under a 2/1.

We can get out in 4m.
Nov. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Had the 3N bid come up once in about 3 years of playing) and got to a thin, cold slam when opener had bad spades. It doesn't come up that often. Then again, needing to make a distinction between invitational bids doesn't either.

Agree with the can't do everything part. However, if you stuff the real good raises in with 2N, you could play the wrong part-score (unless you play 2N is forcing, which seems unplayable, to me). And if 3N is all unbalanced, big raises, it seems like opener could be guessing (I know the shortness is most likely opener's major, but you could be 2-1-6-4, with the shortness the key). Opener might have to guess whether to bid over 3N.
Nov. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
This is taking ELC to the extreme. I've never heard anyone propose using it with a 4 card suit.
Nov. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Nothing's perfect. Passing risks missing a game. He certainly shouldn't have started with Dbl. And W's pass indicated a preference for over at least one other suit. He shouldn't double with this strength and a side singleton.
Nov. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Yeah, I was just picking on the worst bids. The best one was still bad.
Nov. 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Need to know what we play. Is 1-3 inv?
Nov. 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
a)3H b)3N
Nov. 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
North for every bid he made. South should have bid 3, but North should have started with 2N.
Nov. 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
John,

Some play 11s-1N-1m-3 is a big raise of the minor (similar to the impossible 2 when 1 was opened). I play this, along with a jump to 3N as a splinter in partner's major (e.g., 1-1H-2D-3N = big raise w/short s).

I certainly see merits in your approach but w/o this, how do you distinguish between a courtesy raise and a serious raise?
Nov. 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I was friends with Steve from the late 70s until he moved from Dalton, GA to LV. I played a little with him (and on teams with him) in the late 70s/very early 80s - also bought baseball cards from him when he owned Dalton Stamp and Coin and wasn't playing bridge much (late 80s/early 90s).

He was an excellent player and a nice guy. I'm sorry I didn't get a chance to “catch up” with him at a LV NABC before he passed away.

RIP, Stevie.
Nov. 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I used to play that 1st step asks shortness, 2nd step asks size (bad, avg., good). You lose 2-2 as natural. I'm not sure which is worth more, but I haven't played it lately. I usually just play 2N asks size (graded in 4 steps). With some, I play:
3 = 5 card suit, then 3D is game try
3// = bad/avg/good w/6 card suit

When the weak 2 is , 3N is the most likely game, so I've never worried about shortness nor suit length being shown in responses.
Nov. 6
Larry Sealy edited this comment Nov. 6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 31 32 33 34
.

Bottom Home Top