Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Jordan Lampe
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I might have 19
Aug. 30, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I'd bid 2 and if I end up in a 6-0 fit, well, there's worse things in life. Sometimes I open a weak two opposite partner's void also. Does that mean I give up my weak twos?
Aug. 29, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If Partner thinks we can take 9 tricks in no trump, isn't +800 better than +400?
Aug. 28, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The way I play it is that 2 asks for my minor, and if partner pulls 2 to 2M, that means he had clubs and longer M, and is going to play 2M. If he really had a 3 suiter with short diamonds, he should've started 2.
Aug. 28, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Sounds like you double counted the downgrade of the QJ to me.
Aug. 22, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Interesting. Looks like we should subtract a point for the stiff honor.
Aug. 15, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Do the results change if you change the stiff to a small doubleton and move the Q elsewhere? Make the hearts AKx for example?
Aug. 14, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Some people seem to think 1NT must absolutely promise 2 cards in every suit … and other people think 1NT is a fine way to solve problem hands such as this one. I admit I don't understand the arguments either way.
Aug. 12, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
In my experience, there are two things that that frightens off new people.

First, is that there are all these RULES to follow. You have to have 12 points to do this and 6 points to do that but that's a 2/1 bid and that's a response not an opener so this other rule applies, etc, etc. It's not so much that the rules are bad, but the sense that if you break one of the rules it's unforgivably bad according to their bridge-knowledgeable peers.

It's usually the case that once you've played around 10 times or so with helpful other players who are willing to walk you through the logic, that you will figure it out enough to be able to pilot on your own. I don't know how to get people to survive the “10 times” though. If I'm running a club like you are, I also don't know how to get the “helpful other players” willing to sit through the 10 times either. Maybe free plays for those coaches or something like that.
Aug. 12, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Off the cuff, the 2m openers seem okay, but the 1 opener looks like trouble. You say "Responder makes a ‘standard rebid’ without a 5 card major. Okay, so I have 10 HCP and 4351 shape. What do I bid over 1? … 1NT? 2? How does that work in competiton? 1-(1)-? Does X promise 5 hearts now?
Aug. 11, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
At IMPs the upside of acting isn't big enough to risk an accident with this level of partnership agreements.
Aug. 9, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Doesn't this mean you have to give up the OP's 2NT showing a 4 piece limit raise?
Aug. 7, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Sounds like we need an article explaining Relay Doubles!
Aug. 6, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Isn't that … what I have?
Aug. 5, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
What would 2NT the previous round have shown?
Aug. 5, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You could invent a whole new system for 4th seat openers based on the fact that you can ditch all the preemptive bids and use all that bidding space for constructive hands that are otherwise hard to bid. 2 as 11-15 with 5 and 4! 3 to show 6, 3 and 17-18. The sky's the limit, the constraint is how much memory load you want for a situation that comes up only around 2% of the time.
Aug. 5, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If you think it's a clear 2 bid, bid 2; no need to feel bad, call the director, or apologize.
Aug. 2, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“Quiz Factor”. The fact that someone is asking the question increases the odds that something slightly weird is the right answer.
July 29, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
QF makes me want to bid 2 but in real life I think if you are fixed stay fixed.
July 29, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The problem is that with flights, every low rated team can just choose whether they want to go up 1 step, 2 steps, or all the way to the top. It's much better the way we do bracketed where a team with insufficient master points has to choose between the bottom bracket where they will win easily, or the top bracket where they will lose quickly. They want to play in the right bracket? Tell 'em to get some masterpoints first. We need the money.
July 16, 2019
.

Bottom Home Top