Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Jordan Lampe
1 2 3 4 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ... 30 31 32 33
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I have always used transfer-then-bid-the-other-major to show 5-5 hands and Smolen to show 5-4 hands, so I don't need to spend my 3 level bids on it.
May 30, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Probably 3 shows something a bit weaker with less diamond support.
May 28, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Don't I have a minimum with crappy trumps?
May 23, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I don't understand our agreement. But if I'm forced to bid 2, I'm forced to bid 2. If I'm going to eventually pull 2, I'll do that later.
May 23, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I suppose if I'm going to bid 3NT now I would have just bid it directly instead of going through Stayman.
May 23, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
What if there's a really difficult problem for a defender … assuming declarer cannot claim. But then declarer chooses not to claim.
May 22, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I think the suggestion here is to not relay the result of the board at all.
May 18, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I think we are in a Forcing Pass, and it looks to me like Partner has long diamonds and crummy spades. And given that he wants to bid on even with that, I think we have to bid on.
May 16, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
On the diagrammed grand, after having NOT doubled 5, it seems like doubling 7 is guaranteed to not get partner off to the right lead. What am I missing?
May 5, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Who's the dealer?
May 3, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
What if partner decides (3)-3-(p)-P-(p) ?? Don't we have X then 4 if we want to show “stuff outside”?
May 1, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I don't know which opponent was from outer space, but in retrospect, I really, really wish my partner had found the red card rather than the card labelled “4NT”.
April 26, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Partner actually had KJx KQJ9x xx Qxx
April 25, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Deleted .. I re-read the OP
April 18, 2017
Jordan Lampe edited this comment April 18, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I don't understand 3NT. I mean, I get that we have a diamond stopper and enough points to be in game. But I only see one single diamond stopper and I'm not sure I can depend on partner to provide the A and AK that I need to have 9 top tricks without losing control on the inevitable 4-2 spade break. Isn't 4 a lot more likely to make when we have to lose the lead to develop our winners?
April 12, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Even though this hand could have an ace less and have bid the same way so far?
April 9, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
That's useful advice. What is it about “2 card support for a 5 (maybe 6) card major” that is less interesting than “3 card support for a 4 (maybe 5) card major”. Is the idea that with only 2 we are much less likely to have a useful ruffing value (that the opponents can't kill by leading trumps)?
April 5, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If it were me, I'd play it as a “support double” showing exactly 2 card support. But everyone thinks I'm weird.
April 5, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I, for one, didn't even know they were happening. Had I known, I would probably still pass because, you know, I actually have to work. And I don't have a huge network of bridge partners who can also skip off work for a full week at the drop of a hat either.
April 5, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
A similar idea: Play lebensohl in these sequences. So after 1M-(2M):

cue = LR+ in M
2NT = relay to 3, showing either a “competitive” minor suit or a single raise
3, 3 = natural and GF
3M = mixed raise

The big win compared to the OP is reduced memory load if you play lebensohl in other situations. The big loss is that if the bidding is suddenly at the 4 or 5 level, Opener doesn't know what Responder's suit is. In terms of pure Bridge Goodness, the loss is obviously bigger, but in the world of actual humans who have to try to remember all this stuff, less clear.
April 5, 2017
1 2 3 4 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ... 30 31 32 33
.

Bottom Home Top