Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Gábor Szőts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 73 74 75 76
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
With 8 sure tricks and the opponents content with 1 I would not be afraid of bidding 3.
Jan. 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
3 is not obligatory with solid diamonds. You can bid 3 as well.
Jan. 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I don't debate the merits of the bid. I was asked what it means and came to my answer by way of elimination.
Jan. 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Only, having a couple of spades himself, that scenario can be excluded or at least extremely unlikely.
Jan. 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
18-19 balanced, no spade stopper, no 4. Responder places contract.

With the solid diamond hand I'd jump to 3. With a big 2-suiter I'd jump in my second suit.
Jan. 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If I only knew an effective rule of thumb!

With an (5332) hand I usually bid on having a side doubleton and pass if I have a doubleton club.
Jan. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I'd have bid 6 at my previous turn.
Jan. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
West has 3622 distribution. Could not double 2 lest it be left in.
Jan. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
3-level splinters can be a minimum, 4-level ones require extras.
Jan. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Even if you don't use illegal information directly, it relieves you of a lot of strain and you'll be able to avoid mistakes by using that spare energy. That effect is invisible and cannot be proven.
Jan. 13
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Too bad you wouldn't play strong NT putting all weak balanced hands in 1.
Jan. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks. Good to hear you have no problems other than memory strain.
Jan. 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You mean 1-1M-1NT, where opener's 1NT is the multi-meaning bid? That's the sequence I am interested in.
Jan. 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It all depends on what 5 over 5 means for them. I feel there was some misunderstanding between them but Mikael might clarify this.
Jan. 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Only, North would not want to bid 5 after signing off in the previous round.
Jan. 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I think it is impossible to avoid slam on this hand. Even if North opens 1, he is certainly driving to slam as soon as he learns that South has short clubs. A possible start could be: 1-2NT-3 (minimum)-3whatever (showing club shortness). He has 13 working points after showing a minimum.
After 1NT and the 4 splinter the situation is similar. North has lost only 2 of his points, so he has a clear acceptance of the slam invitation.

If there would be a method to show long hearts by South it could direct North's focus on hearts but I doubt there is one. Maybe South should have started with a transfer to hearts…
Jan. 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If you want to allow partner to jump to 3M as an invitation, you must have at least 2 high honour in hearts.
Jan. 8
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I do mind your reply above, Timo. Just because 2m is GF there is no reason why 3NT shall not be similar to 1m-1M-3NT.
Jan. 8
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Now after one and a half year I wonder if anyone here has tried to play opener's 1NT as the Gazzilli bid.
My biggest concern regarding this is that NT might be wrong-sided too often.

So if you have experience either for or against, please share.
Jan. 8
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
See my edited text. 1-2-2 shows hearts.
Jan. 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 73 74 75 76
.

Bottom Home Top