Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Doug Bennion
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Just for fun? I did the test two consecutive days. Like a couple of other posters I ran across many questions which I could answer this way or that, almost coin flips, the choice at the time some agglomeration of mood and recollection and who knows what.

Anyway, for what it's worth I'm INTJ and these were the scoring deltas (Test 2 subtract Test 1)

(-22, -25, 0, -11)

I have no idea what that might mean.
Aug. 12, 2014
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Surely once a topic drops into the Get More Content bin, audience interest plummets. Forum segmentation would permit members to prioritize their own particular interests, and overall would keep more topics alive and visible for longer periods. For example, I'd follow religiously a forum dedicated to conventions/systems, but would peek in only occasionally at a forum discussing, say, club issues.

Also sometimes an Article TITLE contains no hints regarding content (or misleads even), so I might overlook a discussion that I would find interesting.
Aug. 10, 2014
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks. Except for the memory load, I like it.
Aug. 9, 2014
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
We play a wide-range (10-16 or so) Flannery with 5 or 6 hearts, so we use different responses to our 2NT enquiry, along the lines of the Ogust responses to a weak 2-bid. It might be dumb but it seems to work OK for us because we like including those 46xx holdings. 2 2NT, then

3 = bad hand, 5 hearts
3 = bad hand, 6 hearts
3 = good hand, 5 hearts
3 = good hand, 6 hearts
3NT = good hand, 4=5=2=2 stoppered

2 then 3m = stopper ask, 3M = slammish.
Aug. 9, 2014
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hi Fred

The Android app is awesome for both playing and viewing on a tablet. It is also awesome for viewing on a phone. It isn't awesome for playing on a phone, but then nothing would be.

I used the older version for viewing on a phone, but don't recall it being awesomer than the Android version, for that purpose. Can't imagine anyone with Android or iOS needing the older version unless they were not aware of the new apps.
Aug. 4, 2014
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If there was a “deal setup” routine within BBO, it would only take a couple of minutes to key in a hand. Then the commentator would have lots of time to catch up to the real-time bidding/play. I wouldn't mind watching a BBO broadcast that was delayed by a couple of minutes.
Aug. 4, 2014
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Yes there are, but Android doesn't support Flash, which apparently is a big deal. The BBO browser version doesn't work on Android, for example. BBO does have a dandy mobile app for both Android and Apple.

Also I think you must download and install some Windows thing from OurGame, which is a no-go on an Android platform.
Aug. 2, 2014
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Despite their “assurances” it will be viewable on a browser, I see no mention of a version for Android tablets and phones, dammit.
Aug. 1, 2014
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I've only seen it used in direct position. I'm sure we discussed its use in balancing but cannot recall off the top of my head, why we chose not to …
June 18, 2014
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I use it over pre-empts only, and that works for me. Over 1-level bids, I use Raptor 1NT. Over 1m openers Raptor shows 5-6 of the other m, plus a 4-card M. Over 1M openers it shows a 5-6 card m, plus 4 of the other M.

Of course then you have to find something to do with those pesky balanced 15-17 hands. For those usually you can find a slightly off-shape X, a 5-card overcall, a chunky 4-card overcall. I'm happy to pay that price.
June 18, 2014
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Yes, kind of, but it depends on the suits that have been bid, and how many. You're right with that auction.

After (1) 1 (2) (again overcaller should try to not have four hearts) then:

X =
2 =
2 = good raise
2 = junk

When three suits have been bid, say (1) 1 (2) then:

X = = cue equivalent
2 =
2 = good raise
2 = junk

That's kind of Transfer Snapdragon

Also works as a Transfer Support X, where ‘good’ raise is four trumps, and ‘not so good’ is three trumps.

And random auctions like ohhh (1) 1 (P) P /(2); then

X = cuebid
2 =
2 = very good rebid
2 = ‘normal’ rebid
May 29, 2014
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Play transfers there, starting with Double. Also helps to play Raptor 1NT overcall, so the 2 overcall denies four spades.

X = (rebiddable, or with tolerance)
2 =
2NT = natural
3 = nice raise (discuss with partner)
3 = junk raise
May 29, 2014
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Toronto clubs allow us (and a growing number of other pairs) to use transfer responses to the balanced 1C opener you describe. In playing them for a number of years, we've had precisely one complaint, that from a litigious sort who knew full well how to handle them but didn't think it fair we could use them but he could not (or so he thought). He had just assumed the club game permitted GCC conventions only.
May 28, 2014
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks Steve. Love the ability to transfer to the unbid suits. Possibly losing those 4=4 heart fits is scary. Might be interesting if the transfer to hearts was 4+. You'd lose some 5=3 fits (finding some later), and possibly play in a few too many Moysians.

You also play those transfers after 1D (2C)?
April 29, 2014
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Steve, in your given example 1D (1S), when you drop negative doubles to play transfers, does your 2D transfer to hearts promise five, or just four? If five, you must miss some four-four heart fits but find that the transfer advantages ultimately win out? Transfers would sure help to relieve my partner's discomfort with negative free bids …

Thsnks.
April 29, 2014
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Haven't yet met a director who hasn't told us to have a written defense. Is a pre-alert required? We'd do it out of courtesy regardless.

I agree the 1D and 1H ‘defenses’ should be obvious (although there are variations and options, like what does 2D show over the 1D response … is it stronger or weaker than Dbl, or something else completely?), but it's not so clear with the 1S response … we use it simply as ‘no majors’ and suggest they double with majors but I'm not sure that's optimum.

April 18, 2014
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Off-specific-topic but analagous, although transfer responses to 1C are permitted by Mid chart, there is not (natch) an official written defence. (Is it interesting that all of the official defenses relate to opening bids and not calls in other positions?)
April 17, 2014
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
For what it’s worth to anybody, I’ve cobbled together the approximate frequency of IQ openers of various ranges, when 15-17 is baselined at 100. For example, for every 100 notrump openers in the 15-17 range, there will be 293 in the 11-14 range.


16-18 72
15-18 116
15-17 100
14-17 156
14-16 133
13-15 169
12-15 248
12-14 195
11-14 293
11-13 236
10-13 330
10-12 261
Dec. 26, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Don’t your classifications ignore frequency, and shouldn’t that be factored? Ummmm for example, playing strong notrumps, when you have a 13-pt balanced hand, you make it much easier for the opps to enter the auction accurately, than if you opened it 1NT. And you have balanced minimums much more often than you will have balanced 15-17.

It’s easy to pick at this advantage or that disadvantage, without looking at the entire picture. The only sure way to test the efficacy of 11-14 say, versus 15-17, is to play them both for a dozen or so sessions, and track your results, making sure you also track what happens when you open balanced 1m, because those 1m openers are the other side of the same coin.
Dec. 21, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I don’t like that scenario either. But your analysis doesn’t account for the good stuff that happens when you open a 13-pt 1NT, and your opps cannot find their M fit, whereas the strong notrumpers opened it 1C, and their opps did find their M fit. 11-14 arises 3X the frequency of 15-17, so that bad scenario happens much more often to strong notrumpers.

The -200 just doesn’t happen very often. If responder is balanced and weak, the opps (not knowing that) usually get active and stumble about trying to find a partial, and rescue us.
Dec. 21, 2013
.

Bottom Home Top