Join Bridge Winners
All comments by David Goldfarb
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13 14 15 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
My partner's hand was Jxxx Kxx 9x AK9x, and even 3S was uncomfortably high. He felt my 3 was an overbid: I felt that my hand was worth a limit raise even if the Q was a low card, and certainly was worth a limit raise with it. (Non-adjusted losing trick count calls my hand a game force. Of course, non-adjusted losing trick count passes his hand.)
July 14
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I felt I was about a queen short of either of those calls.
July 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The hand I held was 654 QT4 J53 KJT7, so NS should be competing in clubs. The question is how – I like the idea of bidding 2C over 1NT, actually.
July 4
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I don't understand your question. Responder did double on the first round.
July 2
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The twice a week game at the Tracy Gee Community Center was $2 when I was starting out in 2011, and then went up to $3, where it's been for a few years now. Still pretty cheap.
June 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Okay, I'll bite: what's #1? “Winning Suit Contract Leads”?
May 22
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Everyone local that I have asked thinks that 4 would show shortness. One person even said it had to be a void.
May 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
With one partner, I play almost exactly that, except it's the jump shift in the other minor rather than the jump shift in spades.
May 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If I'm reading the above correctly, a 4 opening is preemptive, a 4 response to a 1 opening is Minorwood.
May 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Vulnerable with a poor suit and a side void, I wouldn't choose 3, but I wouldn't be very angry with a partner who did.

5 now seems like a call with quite a few potential upsides. It isn't ironclad, but very little in bridge ever is.
May 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I definitely like “Square Deal”.
April 28
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The link takes me to an article where the bridge content is completely unreadable. Why not link to the article here? https://bridgewinners.com/article/view/sidney-lazards-great-coup/
April 23
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I voted for West being a bot, on the basis that a bot, analyzing double dummy simulations, would assume that East would automatically find its side entry and so not need to overtake.
April 21
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The bots do not see all four hands. They have their ideas of what bids should mean, and they run simulations based on that. They evaluate the simulations using a fast double-dummy solver, which often leads to some oddities compared to how humans do things. But they don't actually play double-dummy.
April 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You're a little late to the party on that one. :-)
April 13
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It's “thou” not “thee”: “thou” is the subjective case and “thee” is the objective. Also “sayeth” is a third person form, and not correct with a second person pronoun. It should be “sayest”. Lastly, “thou” is singular – when you write “what sayest thou” you imagine addressing each one of your readers individually. Since you're addressing a group, the plural “What say you?” seems better to me.
April 13
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
We were indeed playing 12-14 NT. It's also our style both: to treat 5-4-2-2 as unbalanced when at all reasonable; and to open 1D and rebid 2C pretty freely on 4=5 in the minors.
April 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The other hands were:

974
AQJT5
J875
K
K2
K6
AT32
AT963

So playing a club was the winning defense. I'm glad to see that my spade got at least a reasonable share of the votes.
April 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Call me pessimistic, but if opener has a minimum hand with club wastage then we lack 5-level safety. E.g.: KJxxx xxx x AKJx. So I'm going to just splinter rather than barge straight into Exclusion. If partner control bids a red suit, I'll follow up with a void-showing 5.
April 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Heavy focus on scholastic tournaments during the last quarter century.
April 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13 14 15 16
.

Bottom Home Top