Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Barry Plotkin
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I've apologized for the statements. I've said that I should have known better. I screwed up.
Aug. 18, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Like I said, I THOUGHT I could take it at face value. Emphasis on “THOUGHT”. I should have known better.
Aug. 18, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I don't believe everything I read, by a long shot…but I think we SHOULD be able to take at face value a report like the one the Daily Bulletin printed. That apparently we couldn't…well, as Ed Judy said just below this, who was the idiot who authorized it's publication?
Aug. 18, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Just got up and read Mike Passell's explanation. If this is the case, then I indeed did overreact, and apologize. As Mike Kopera said, I was reacting to someone convicted of an ethical offense that I felt merited the maximum penalty.

I would be VERY curious to see what happened from the Committee's viewpoint/records/minutes. If those are the same as what Mike has told us, then that Committee are the ones who should be strung up, not Mike Passell
Aug. 18, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Just got up and read Mike Passell's explanation. If this is the case, then I indeed did overreact, and apologize. As Mike Kopera said, I was reacting to someone convicted of an ethical offense that I felt merited the maximum penalty.

I would be VERY curious to see what happened from the Committee's viewpoint/records/minutes. If those are the same as what Mike has told us, then that Committee are the ones who should be strung up, not Mike Passell.
Aug. 18, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Just woke up and saw all this. Reply coming below.
Aug. 18, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It's not disrespectful to say that someone found to have cheated should be banned for life. It's protective of the game itself, which should be everyone's first priority.

“The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.”
Aug. 17, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The verdict has already been passed, remember?
Aug. 17, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
He was found guilty. For what he was found guilty of, his punishment is not an execution, it is a joke and a stain upon the game.
Aug. 17, 2015
Barry Plotkin edited this comment Aug. 17, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It's not possible to cause damage out of proportion to what he did.
Aug. 17, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The “nature of the infraction”? Read the paragraph again. If that isn't cheating, I don't know what is.
Aug. 17, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I don't care if he predetermined one card, or all 52. He cheated, he should be gone for life.
Aug. 17, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
He prearranged a deal. HE CHEATED.
Aug. 17, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
He was convicted of cheating. That's all we need to know. You get convicted of cheating, you should be banned for life.
Aug. 17, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I'm glad you think it's a joke. Some of us don't take cheating that lightly.
Aug. 17, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
There are some actions that are so grave, that do SO much damage to our game, that there should be no forgiveness, no redemption. Cheating is one of them. Goodbye, good riddance, don't let the door hit them in the ass on the way out. I don't care who it is, or what the level. You cheat in an ACBL-sanctioned event, you get caught, goodbye.
Aug. 17, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The travesty is in NOT hanging him (so to speak) or any other cheater publically. You cheat, you get caught, you should be GONE.
Aug. 17, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
How much more definitive fact do we need? The pronouncement in the Bulletin speaks for itself. The fact that a cheat–in ANY way–is allowed to still play is a stain upon our game. FAR greater, than say, convention disruption.
Aug. 17, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Not for cheating, no, they should not.
Aug. 17, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
People have been banned in other sports where they are independent contractors, i.e. track and field for one example.

Mike Passell deserves no sympathy, sorry. He got a gift with this joke of a suspension. In a world where the powers that be gave a **** about the image of the game Mike Passell would NEVER PLAY IN AN ACBL-SANCTIONED EVENT AGAIN.
Aug. 17, 2015
.

Bottom Home Top