Join Bridge Winners
Why I suck at matchpoints (part 2)

Several days ago I posted a poll intended to identify the difference in competitive bidding between matchpoints and imps.

South
x
J108xxx
KJxx
Jx
W
N
E
S
1
P
1
P
2
P
P
?

I asked whether you would bid at matchpoints and at imps. As I write this, bidders are exceeding passers at matchpoints by about two to one, but passers are exceeding bidders by almost three to one at imps. Most bidders are bidding 3H but there is a small contingent of doublers and four "others" which I presume would be 2NT.

I would be interested in the thoughts of the doublers. Double keeps a penalty pass in play but I do not believe you want partner to convert. Partner does not have five spades, having values but not having overcalled over 1C. If you double and convert clubs to diamonds (or bid diamonds after partner's 2NT advance), I would expect that you are showing longer diamonds than hearts. Conversely, if you bid 2NT and convert 3C to 3D, you should have longer hearts than diamonds.

I passed 2S. I know I would pass at imps and I could not bring myself to bid vulnerable at matchpoints. I would like to report that partner was 4=1=3=5 and bidding resulted in a significant penalty but that was not the case. Here is the actual deal.

West
AQJx
Kxx
10x
K10xx
North
xxx
AQ
A7xx
Qxxx
East
Kxxxx
xx
Qxx
Axx
South
x
J108xxx
KJxx
Jx
W
N
E
S
1
P
1
P
2
P
P
?
D

If you sold to 2S, you scored -110 for a surprising 57% of the matchpoints. The most common result was -140 where the defense failed to blow up the HK. If you bid and were allowed to play 3H, on careful play you could have scored +140 and a beer. More likely, the opponents with nine spades would take the push and +50 was worth 77%.

37 Comments
Getting Comments... loading...
.

Bottom Home Top