Join Bridge Winners
Was I injured

West
KJ10632
Q54
7
942
North
AQ7
J9
J983
AJ86
East
54
K6
AK642
10753
South
98
A108732
Q105
KQ
W
N
E
S
1NT
2
3
?
D

 

1N 10 to 12

2H Natural playing Meckwell

3S At this time I asked what 3S was and was told it was invitational. I doubled for penalty and we beat it 2. Although technically could beat it 3. J of hears lead ducked to Q.

 

Players had notes.I asked to see since if bid was incorrect different than if explanation was incorrect. According to notes this sequence was forcing, explained as invitational when it actuality it was weak. I believe if it was explained as weak I would have bid 3N, If explained as forcing according to notes I would have passed and assume they would be a level higher somewhere.

Now discussion became if they had no notes as many players wouldn't the explanation of misbid  have been accepted with no redress. Why should they be punished because they have notes. I stated my opinion is when it could be misbid or could be misexplanation of bid offenders should prove that explanation was correct. 

 

 

Yes damaged score should be adjusted
Yes damaged but no redress misbid accepted
No damage since misbid
other - someone will come up with a different answer.

Sorry, to answer polls. Registered users can vote in polls, and can also browse other users' public votes! and participate in the discussion.

Getting results...
loading...
101 Comments
Getting Comments... loading...
.

Bottom Home Top