Join Bridge Winners
Rare double squeeze almost.
(Page of 2)

West
73
J
10652
AQJ1097
North
AKQJ854
6
K974
6
East
1062
Q1083
Q83
854
South
9
AK97542
AJ
K32
W
N
E
S
 
1
P
2
P
3
P
4
X
P
P
4
P
4
P
4N
P
5
P
6N
P
P
P
D
6NT South
NS: 0 EW: 0

 

West led a spade against 6NT and declarer muttered something that North should not pass the double with a club control. 6S as can be seen is much better than 6NT. But South was afraid of two fast club tricks in 6S.

After 6 rounds of spades this was the position:

West
J
10652
AQ
North
4
6
K974
6
East
Q108
Q83
5
South
AK97
AJ
K
D
When the last spade came, East was unsure about the position and discarded his last club.   Declarer now finessed in diamonds and took the ace of diamonds and played three rounds of hearts.   East had to surrender the last trick to dummys diamond king.   This was perhaps not well defended by East, who could have saved the day by discarding a diamond instead of the last club.  But he was not sure about the distribution and what to keep or not.   Perhaps even West should have discarded a diamond to help east.  West was not sure either.

Now the rare squeeze.

Suppose declarers and dummys high diamonds are switched.

West
J
10652
AQ
North
4
6
A974
6
East
Q108
Q83
5
South
AK97
KJ
K
D

 

Now if East discards a low diamond, declarer can finesse diamonds and play AK of hearts. 

West will then be steppingstone squeezed in the minors.  Some kind of 'double steppingstone squeeze'. Both defenders are squeezed with some kind of stepping stone element.  Not sure I have seen that one before.

3 Comments
Getting Comments... loading...
.

Bottom Home Top