Join Bridge Winners
No agreement

All players are world class players.   

Teams.  No screens.

West
J1094
10982
J10943
North
KJ7532
73
KQJ54
East
A104
KQ65
A763
K6
South
Q986
A82
AQ8752
W
N
E
S
1
1NT
4
P
5
X
5
P
P
X
P
P
P
D
5X North
NS: 0 EW: 0

12 tricks made.  790 N/S

4 = How many partnerships have this situation discussed?  -  Well N/S had not discussed this situation.

I came to the table when the play was over.  There was a heavy agreement about the bidding, N/S accused of being unethical etc...  

I did not see there were any unauthorized information.  I did not see any difference if screens would have been in use.  - But there may be a chance of misinformation, because N/S had no agreement about the 4 bid.

East asked about the bidding when it was his turn at and was informed that this situation had not been discussed.

My ruling was...   Table score stands.

The team captain of E/W asked for review of the ruling and the double was taken back because if E/W had known that South had a splinter, he would not have doubled 5.

58 Comments
Getting Comments... loading...
.

Bottom Home Top