Bridge musings:
- An attribute I value (for bridge and otherwise) is recognizing what you do not know: ask more questions, state fewer conclusions. Only sometimes do I act as I say one should act.
- Wish that master points award system would motivate players to continue to challenge themselves to improve: need to better align awards with the achievements producing the awards.
- Wish that club directors would (politely) instruct players about Unauthorized Information and Logical Alternatives; that is, Fair Play. Not a crime (but then, not an accolade, either) to take too much or too little time to think about a call or play, but is unethical for partner to take winning inferences from the pace of the call or play.
- Am deeply involved in developing and teaching after school bridge programs. Teach play before bidding (mini-bridge), teach declarer play before defensive play, teach notrump play before suit play. But, first, ensure kids are safe, have fun, allow other kids to learn, and respect each other, the teachers, and the school. See www.newenglandyouthbridge.org.
- Loved bridge from the moments I learned to play, but placed bridge behind other matters such as career and family. Took a 15 year hiatus from significant play.
- Still improving as a player. Do not look forward to the time when my skills will plateau.
- Best skill as a bridge player: envisaging during the auction how the play might proceed. Poorest skill as a bridge player: perhaps too many to mention.
Am I doing something illegal or something requiring an alert from my partner if I were to routinely open 1 of a major suit in 3rd chair under this scenario: (1) say, KQxxx of the bid major and no other high cards; (2) 3 cards in the other major; (3) 3-2 in the minor suits; (4) using a standard base where 1 of a minor shows 3+ in the opened minor suit; and (5) using two-way Drury (so that both 2♣ and 2♦ show raises in the opened major suit)?
Edit: in light of the first comment offered below, perhaps I should be more explicit/more precise in my wording. I would routinely seriously consider opening 1M under the conditions described, where I felt I could handle whatever response my partner makes. Sometimes I would still reject the consideration, dependent upon vulnerability, status of game, how I felt, whatever.
Obviously this question is derived from some of the issues raised in the threads on the Spain-USA match in Poland.
