Join Bridge Winners
Invite 3N or commit?

A deeply flawed nine-point hand.....

South
K
AQ3
109865
10643
W
N
E
S
P
1NT
P
?

Here 1NT is 15-17, could include a 5-card major.  Assume for the sake of argument that the only question is whether the partnership will play one, two, or three notrump so South's problem is whether to pass, invite 3N (stopping in 2N if the invitation is rejected), or commit to 3N.

If the specific bidding structure is relevant, NS are playing four-suit transfers so the invitational sequence is 2C followed by 2N; the alternatives are pass and a direct 3N.

Please select up to 4 choices.

This hand is worth 3NT vulnerable at IMPs
This hand is worth 3NT not vulnerable at IMPs
This hand is worth inviting 3NT vulnerable at matchpoints, but not worth committing to 3NT
This hand is worth inviting 3NT not vulnerable at matchpoints, but not worth committing to 3NT
Not worth inviting at either vulnerability or scoring
This hand is worth inviting 3NT vulnerable at IMPs but not worth committing to 3NT
This hand is worth inviting 3NT not vulnerable at IMPs but not worth committing to 3NT
This hand is worth 3NT vulnerable at matchpoints
This hand is worth 3NT not vulnerable at matchpoints

Sorry, to answer polls. Registered users can vote in polls, and can also browse other users' public votes! and participate in the discussion.

Getting results...
loading...
42 Comments
Getting Comments... loading...
.

Bottom Home Top